Приклади вживання Patriarchate of moscow Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Patriarchate of Moscow.
This means that its administrative assimilation into the Patriarchate of Moscow is entirely precluded.
The Patriarchate of Moscow.
In Katugino the transfer of St. Stephen's Church of Kiev Patriarchate of Moscow led to conflict.
The Patriarchate of Moscow.
Люди також перекладають
In 1991, he sought autocephaly, not from the Ecumenical Patriarchate, but from according to him the“Mother Church”, the Patriarchate of Moscow.
Patriarchate of Moscow established.
He also calls on the Greek Church to“assume the role of mediator” in order tostart a dialogue between the Patriarchate of Constantinople and the Patriarchate of Moscow.
The Patriarchate of Moscow is diametrically opposed.
The conditions outlined by the Patriarchal and Synodal“Act” confirm beyond any doubt that the canonical territory of theMetropolis of Kyiv was not ceded to the Patriarchate of Moscow.
In reality, the Patriarchate of Moscow is just another local Church, one among many.
When the participants in the synod on March 8 and 9,voted for the“reunification” of their Church with the Patriarchate of Moscow, all the Ukrainian Greek Catholic bishops were behind bars in prisons.
The Patriarchate of Moscow, following the situation in Ukraine, has stepped up pressure on the ageing Patriarch Ilia in order to win his support.
The Metropolitan of Nafpaktos allegedly emphasized that the Russian side and the Patriarchate of Moscow have been undermining the Ecumenical Patriarchate over time, a fact that the Church of Greece cannot ignore.
At the same time, the believers who do not want to join the local independent Church should have the right to freely choose their canonical jurisdiction,including the option of remaining under the jurisdiction of the Patriarchate of Moscow.
That is: which of the two Churches- the Patriarchate of Moscow or that of Constantinople- should be considered the Mother Church to be addressed with the petition of autocephaly?
Autocephaly(from the Greek:“property of being self-headed”) acknowledges independence from all other local churches,including the Patriarchate of Moscow, which does not recognize the canonical nature of Saturday's election.
The Ukrainian Orthodox Church in communion with the Patriarchate of Moscow(UOC- MP) is the largest church in the country, and the only one recognized by the fellowship of the Orthodox churches worldwide.
But this attempt runs the risk of precipitating a schism which has been smoldering for a long time among Orthodox Churches which recognize a primacy of honor to the Patriarchate of Constantinople andthose who favor the Patriarchate of Moscow.
On the other hand, the Patriarchate of Moscow and the group of supporting Churches insist that declaring autocephaly is a prerogative of the Mother Church, from which a new autocephalous Church separates.
The requirement for every Metropolitan of Kyiv to commemorate“among the first” during the Divine Liturgy the name of the Ecumenical Patriarch constitutes the clearest evidence that theEparchy of Kyiv was not granted to the Patriarchate of Moscow as its canonical territory.
The Patriarchate of Moscow knew all this, of course, which is why it arbitrarily violated these conditions and never adhered to them precisely because it sought to capriciously incorporate the Metropolis of Kyiv(and Ukraine) into its canonical jurisdiction.
Likewise the Synod decided to support"granting autocephaly to the entire Orthodox Church of Ukraine(not to only one part), however this can onlybe realized through agreement between Ecumenical Patriarchate and the Patriarchate of Moscow and Pan-Orthodox consensus.".
The Patriarchate of Moscow knew all this, of course, which is why it arbitrarily violated these conditions and never adhered to them precisely because it sought to capriciously incorporate the Metropolis of Kyiv(and Ukraine) into its canonical jurisdiction.
Being rooted in the spiritual and cultural heritage of the Russian emigration, the parishes and communities of the Archdiocese face many questions from the faithful,regarding the tensions that have emerged recently between the Patriarchate of Moscow and the Ecumenical Patriarchate on which we depend.
Unfortunately, because the Patriarchate of Moscow was absent from the Council of Crete in 2016, it was not possible to discuss the question of granting autocephaly, so it lost the opportunity to decide together with the other Churches about its granting.
It became obvious that this crisis is not only aproblem of bilateral relations between the Patriarchate of Constantinople and the Patriarchate of Moscow but concerns the entire world Orthodoxy- all the local Orthodox Churches since it destroys the very foundations of the life and mission of the Church of Christ.
The Patriarchate of Moscow knew all this, of course, which is why it arbitrarily violated these conditions and never adhered to them precisely because it sought to capriciously incorporate the Metropolis of Kyiv(and Ukraine) into its canonical jurisdiction.
Ţhe Patriarchate of Moscow, as a local Church, and according to the official ecclesiastical Acts regarding its foundation, also has canonical jurisdiction, with geographical boundaries and geographical limits, and thus conforms to the canonical teaching and ecclesiology of the Orthodox Church.
The Patriarchate of Moscow, as the local Church and in accordance with its official founding ecclesiastical Acts, also has its canonical jurisdiction with geographical boundaries and geographical restrictions, according once again to the canonical teaching and ecclesiology of the Orthodox Church.