Примери за използване на Applicant complained на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The applicant complained that one of the….
On 28 December 1996 the applicant complained to the Regional Public Prosecutor that his pre-trial detention was unlawful.
The applicant complained of the conditions of his detention in Kremikovtsi Prison Hostel.
The applicant complained that for more than nine years she had not been allowed to leave Bulgaria.
The applicant complained that the criminal proceedings against him had lasted unreasonably long.
The applicant complained that the criminal proceedings against him had been excessively lengthy.
The applicant complained of a violation of his rights guaranteed by Article 3 of the Convention.
The applicant complained that the criminal proceedings against him had been excessively lengthy.
The applicant complained that the duration of the criminal proceedings brought against him had been excessive.
The applicant complained that his criminal conviction and sentence had infringed his right to freedom of expression.
The applicant complained that the criminal proceedings against him have not been concluded within a reasonable time.
The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention that her son had been beaten up by the police in October 1996.
The applicant complained that he had been subjected to ill-treatment by police officers and that no effective investigation had been carried out into the incident.
On 2 December, the applicant complained about his punishment to the complaints officer invoking, inter alia, Articles 5 and 6 art.
The applicant complained that she had no effective remedy available to her in respect of the matters complained of above.
The applicant complained under Article 13 of the Convention that he had had no effective remedies against the violation alleged above.
The applicant complained that his right to be tried within a reasonable time or to be released from detention pending trial was violated.
On 25 February, the applicant complained about his punishment to the complaints officer alleging, inter alia, violations of the Convention.
The applicant complained that her requests to renounce her Bulgarian nationality were repeatedly refused which, in her view, encroached on her Convention rights.
The applicant complained that he did not have an effective remedy in respect of the shaving of his head and the interference with his right to freedom of expression.
The applicant complained that his lawyer had not been summoned for the examination of the second appeal against detention and that that appeal had not been dealt with speedily.
The applicant complained that after her arrest on 24 October 1995 she had not been brought before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power.
The applicant complained that the length of the proceedings had been incompatible with the“reasonable time” requirement, provided in Article 6§ 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows.
The applicant complained under Articles 2, 6 and 13 of the Convention that the national authorities had failed to carry out an effective investigation into the death of her daughter.
The applicant complained under Article 6§ 1 of the Convention that when examining her action for damages against her employer, the courts of all levels had refused to consider her claim on its merits.
The applicant complained that his detention in a regular detention facility, in view of his state of health, amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention.
The first applicant complained that his deportation had been a reaction to and a punishment for his lawful religious activities and had therefore constituted an unjustified interference with his rights under Article 9 of the Convention.
The applicant complained under Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention that he would face a serious risk of being killed and being subjected to torture or inhuman treatment if he were to be expelled to his country of origin, Serbia and Montenegro.
In his reply, the applicant complained that the reproductions of the various staff reports supplied did not make it possible in all cases to distinguish clearly the mark attributed to the criteria‘Productivity' and‘Speed in performing tasks'.
The applicant complained that the failure of the authorities to provide her with assistance despite the fact that she was a minor left alone after her parents' arrest in December 2002, had provoked serious stress and suffering, in breach of Article 8 of the Convention, which reads as follows.