Примери за използване на External competence на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
External competence(EU).
On the application of these rules in relation to the EU's external competence, see, inter alia, Case 22/70 ERTA[1971] ECR 263.
Determining external competence prior to the start of the negotiations on the Convention.
If the internal action has taken the formof complete harmonisation in a given area, there is exclusive external competence with respect to that area.
Acces to external competence is limited.
The Commission, supported by the Parliament, rejects the notion that the Lisbon Treaty has reduced the scope of the European Union's external competence.
The EU now has exclusive external competence in this field as confirmed by the Court of Justice.
Setting up the European External Action Service is the natural corollary of the process whereby the European Union is acquiring more and more external competences.
All parties agree that the European Union has external competence to negotiate an international agreement on rights of broadcasting organisations.
At the same time, following the adoption of EU legislation on the cross-border service of documents,the EU has acquired exclusive external competence for the issue in accordance with Article 3(2) TFEU.
If exclusive external competence is established under Article 3(2) TFEU, external competence per se could not possibly be denied under Article 216(1) TFEU.
The Commission seeks annulment of the Decision on the ground that it fails to respect the European Union's exclusive external competence in the area of protection of rights of broadcasting organisations.
Due to the exclusive external competence of the European Union in this area, only it can negotiate and conclude a visa waiver agreement, and not the individual Member States.
The fact that the internal market is a shared competence does not mean that the external competence to conclude an international agreement on intellectual property is also shared.
Whether external competence is exclusive depends on whether the conclusion of the Convention affects common rules or alters their scope within the meaning of Article 3(2) TFEU.
If the framers of the Treaties had intended to limit the European Union's external competence and amend 40-year old case-law, the Commission assumes that they would have made that intention clear.
It considers the discontinuation of the revision of the convention as a serious step back from this perspective, but sees no possibility to continue this work at the present stage,since it has been informed by the European Union delegation that most issues covered by the convention fall under the exclusive external competence of the European Union and that the European Union does not have any intention to become party to the convention.”.
International agreements entered into by the Community when exercising its external competence based on the rules of the Regulation on the service of documents shall not be binding upon and shall not be applicable in Denmark.
Action for annulment- External action of the European Union- International agreements- Protection of neighbouring rights of broadcasting organisations- Negotiations for a Convention of the Council of Europe- Decision of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States authorising the joint participation of the Union and its Member States in the negotiations- Article 3(2)TFEU- Exclusive external competence of the Union.
In many but not all language versions those differences appear to suggest that it might be easier to establish exclusive external competence under Article 3(2) TFEU than competence under Article 216(1) TFEU.
(126) It applies irrespective of whether the European Union's external competence is shared or exclusive,(127) although clearly the need to cooperate is all the more pressing where a mixed agreement needs to be negotiated and concluded.
It therefore seeks to define the scope of the exercise by the European Union of a shared competence with the Member States which was conferred on it by the Treaties, andnot to limit the scope of the exclusive external competence of the European Union in the cases referred to in Article 3(2) TFEU, as clarified by the case-law of the Court referred to above.
Thus, the European Union has external competence when, despite the absence of express conferral, the adoption of common rules necessarily vests in the European Union's competence to conclude international agreements relating to the subject-matter governed by those common rules.
According to the Council, supported by the intervening Member States, reading Article 3(2) TFEU together with Article 2(2) TFEU andProtocol No 25 shows that the exclusive external competence of the European Union is confined to those elements of an international agreement that are governed by the EU acts in question.
Thus, whether the European Union has exclusive external competence under the final phrase of Article 3(2) TFEU in essence depends on a detailed and comprehensive comparison between the areas covered by the envisaged international agreement and EU law.
At the same time, if it is correct that the analysis under Article 216(1)(‘is there competence?') should precede examination of the competence's character(‘is the competence exclusive?'), then showing that concluding the international agreement is likely to affect or distort the scope of common rules automatically means that the competence is exclusive andexcludes the possibility of establishing shared external competence.
The Commission, supported by the Parliament,submits that the European Union has exclusive external competence to negotiate and conclude international agreements in an area that is largely covered by EU rules which are more than minimum requirements.
However, I should like to highlight the imbalance between the internal and external competence of Parliament, in foro interno and in foro externo, in connection with the common commercial policy, given that the Treaty of Lisbon does not provide Parliament with the right to approve the mandate of the Commission to negotiate a trade agreement.
As the matter of international child abduction falls within the exclusive external competence of the European Union, the decision whether to accept the accession of San Marino has to be taken at EU level by means of a Council Decision.
As the matter of international child abduction falls into the exclusive external competence of the European Union, the decision whether the EU, via its Member States, should accept other countries' accession to the 1980 Convention has to be taken by means of a Council Decision.