Примери за използване на Programme closure на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Payment of the balance and programme closure.
Audits of programme closures from the 1994-1996 period.
Article 73 particularly relevant for the programme closure scheduled for 2017 56.
The Commission makes controls on all expenditure several years after the actual year of a given payment,primarily at programme closure.
The supporting documentation to be provided by the Member State at programme closure is defined in the legal framework.
Хората също превеждат
Example The Commission will verify at programme closure whether this project is operational and, if not, it will apply the requisite financial correction.
According to the Withdrawal Agreement, the CPR applies to the UK until programme closure.
Providing the basis for programme closure, these annual declarations were intended to make the process easier and quicker than in the previous period.
Conformity audits can be carried out, anddecisions taken, after programme closure.
As beneficiaries are required to keep documents for 3 years after programme closure, DG REGIO and DG EMPL can undertake audits after closure.
We also analysed the timeliness ofthe closure process and whether the budgetary authority is informed about the outcome of programme closure.
The preparation and ongoing management of the PCM plan was agreed during the three Programme Closure Group meetings and the three Programme Closure meetings held between October 2014 and March 2015.
The Commission repeats its comment that expenditure is controlled several years after the actual year of a given payment,primarily at programme closure.
The Court therefore considers that, for programme closure to be effective(which depends on the quality of the information provided by audit authorities), the Commission will need to have developed a sufficiently robust monitoring of audit authorities' work by that time.
XAnother concern relates to the Commission's reporting on the outcome of programme closure in both areas.
Programme closure in rural development is based on the annual accounts submitted by the Member States for each financial year in the programme period(2007 to 2015) and the corresponding acceptance by the Commission(financial clearance decisions).
In four of the five projects considered by the Court to be totally ineligible because they were not operational,the Commission considers that the rules allow a determination on this issue only at programme closure.
In the EU's budget system,which is built on multiannual programming, we consider that programme closure should entail a final acceptance by the Commission that the expenditure for the programme period as a whole was legal and regular, account being taken of the results of all EU and national checks and audits, together with a report on programme implementation and results.
The significant overlap between tasks for the different periods and the administrative difficulties faced when following up activities, some of which took place more than a decade earlier,pose a risk to the effectiveness of programme closure.
Section 3.5‘Non-functioning projects':‘at the time of the submission of the closure documents,Member States have to ensure that all projects included in the programme closure are functioning, meaning completed and in use, so considered as eligible'.
Conclusions and recommendations 58 Recommendation 2 In its legislative proposals for the post-2020 period, the Commission should introduce in the legislative proposals a final acceptance concerning the legality and regularity of programme expenditure and the outputs andresults achieved at programme closure.
As already stated by the Court in its 2008 Annual Report, this increases the risk that ineligible projects are reimbursed by the EU budget when expenditure which has been found to be ineligible isreplaced by new expenditure(‘withdrawal') without an effective ex-ante verification by the Member State before programme closure(7).(6) Article 39(2) of Council Regulation(EC) No 1260/1999 OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p.
To ease the pressure on the national budget and accelerate much-needed investments, it is proposed to extend the co-financing rate of 85% for all operational programmes supportedby the ERDF and ESF in Cyprus until programme closure.
As already stated by the Court in its 2008 Annual Report, this increases the risk that ineligible projects are reimbursed by the EU budget when expenditure which has been found to be ineligible isreplaced by new expenditure(‘withdrawal') without an effective exante verification by the Member State before programme closure( 7).
There is clear accountability for performance Requirement for the Member States to transmit to the Commission data on performance of programmes for all funds Mandatory annual implementation reports by Member States Strategic reports required from the Commission Performance data is readily and publicly available online Commission is required to explicitly accept the outputs and results achieved at programme closure 12.
For example, for 14% of ERDF operational programmes closure took more than 4 years.
According to the closure guidelines for cohesion, at the time of submission of the closure documents,Member States have to ensure that all projects included in the programmes closure are functioning, meaning completed and in use.
The only moment where a final conclusion can be reached on the functioning of an operational programme is at closure where a residual error rate is established taking into account all financial corrections incurred during the life of the programme.
Payment of the balance and closure of the programme.
Article 36Payment of the balance and closure of the programme.