Примери за използване на Value of commodities на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Abstract labor: Labor that creates the exchange value of commodities.
But the value of commodities has been concealed in recent times by the conditions governing prices.
So far we have considered just one element of the value of commodities, namely the cost-price.
The value of commodities is in inverse ratio to the productiveness of labour.
Hitherto we have considered only one element of the value of commodities, namely the cost-price.
If then we disregard the use value of commodities, they have only one common property left, that of being products of labour.
Let us now pass from the commodity considered as a use value to the value of commodities.
Technological advance will reduce the value of commodities- food, healthcare and housing- towards zero.
The level of the rate of profit is likewise a magnitude held within certain specific limits determined by the value of commodities.
Indeed, this reduction of the value of commodities to their cost-price is the basis of his People's Bank.
On the one hand all labour is, speaking physiologically, an expenditure of human labour-power, and in its character of identical abstract human labour, it creates and forms the value of commodities.
The"value of gold was fixed, and the value of commodities had declined in consequence of the reduced cost of production!
On the one hand, all labor is an expenditure of human labor-power, in the physiological sense, and it is in this quality of being equal, or abstract,human labor that it forms the value of commodities.
It has been shown that the value of commodities, or the price of production regulated by their total value, resolves itself into.
On the one hand, all labour is an expenditure of human labour-power, in the physiological sense, and it is in this quality of being equal, or abstract,human labour that it forms the value of commodities.
If the use value of commodities be disregarded there remains in them only one common property- that of being products of labour.
We must now turn also to the other component of the value of commodities, namely the excess over the cost-price, or the surplus-value.
The use value of commodities becomes valueless, and their value vanishes in the face of their own form of value. .
In so far as labour is value-creating, andis manifested in the value of commodities, it has nothing to do with the distribution of this value among various categories.
But the value of commodities, according to our assumption, is determined, in the first instance, by the price of the labour producing the commodities, by wages.
To the extent that labor creates value, and materializes itself in the value of commodities, it has nothing to do with the distribution of this value among the different categories.
All these experiences bear out the illusion created by the independent and distorted form of the component values, namely, that either wages alone, orwages and profit together, determine the value of commodities.
But how is the value of commodities expressed which may be said to represent the importance of these commodities in the social and economic life?
However, we are acquainted only with one function of money, namely, to serve as the form of manifestation of the value of commodities, or as the material in which the magnitudes of their values are socially expressed.
Therefore, the value of commodities is sacrificed for the purpose of safeguarding the fantastic and independent existence of this value in money….
This illusion would necessarily arise, because in the actual movement of individual capitals, andthe commodities produced by them, not the value of commodities would appear to be a precondition of its splitting but, conversely, the components into which it is split function as a precondition of the value of the commodities. .
The value of commodities produced with water-power is smaller because a smaller total quantity of labour is required for their production, i.e., less labour- in materialised form- enters into the constant capital as part of the latter.
We see, then, that everything our analysis of the value of commodities previously told us is repeated by the linen itself, as soon as it enters into association with another commodity, the coat.
The value of commodities appears, directly, solely in the influence of fluctuating productivity of labour upon the rise and fall of the prices of production, upon their movement and not upon their ultimate limits.
The fundamentally erroneous dogma to the effect that the value of commodities in the last analysis may be resolved into wages+ profit+ rent also expresses itself in the proposition that the consumer must ultimately pay for the total value of the total product;