Примери коришћења External validity на Енглеском и њихови преводи на Српски
{-}
- 
                        Colloquial
                    
- 
                        Ecclesiastic
                    
- 
                        Computer
                    
- 
                        Latin
                    
- 
                        Cyrillic
                    
One aspect of external validity is the setting in which an intervention is tested.
For most well-designed and well-run experiments,concerns about external validity are the hardest to address.
One aspect of external validity is the setting in which an intervention is tested.
For most well-designed andwell-run experiments, concerns about external validity are the hardest to address.
External validity summarizes the findings of the population, the situation and other independent variables.
The concepts of internal and external validity were first introduced by Campbell(1957).
The ability to transfer the results obtained in the study to real life depends on how high and good external validity is.
The concepts of internal and external validity were first introduced by Campbell(1957).
Fortunately, the digital age enables researchers to move beyond these data-free speculations and assess external validity empirically.
Finally, external validity centers around whether the results of this experiment would generalize to other situations.
Fortunately, the digital age enables researchers to move beyond these data-free speculations and assess external validity empirically.
Finally, external validity centers around whether the results of this experiment would generalize to other situations.
Compared with analog-age experiments, in digital-age experiments,it should be easier to address external validity empirically, and it should also be easier to ensure internal validity. .
Another aspect of external validity is whether alternative operationalizations of the same intervention will have similar effects.
See Shadish, Cook, and Campbell(2001) for a more detailed history and a careful elaboration of statistical conclusion validity,  internal validity, construct validity,  and external validity.
Finally, external validity centers around whether the results of this experiment can be generalized to other situations.
Compared to analog age experiments,in digital age experiments it should be easier to address external validity empirically and it should be easier to ensure internal validity. .
There are questions about the external validity of the Aspergers diagnosis, that is, it is unclear whether there is a practical benefit in distinguishing Aspergers from HFA and from PDD-NOS;
See Shadish, Cook, and Campbell(2001) for a more detailed history and a careful elaboration of statistical conclusion validity,  internal validity, construct validity,  and external validity.
The fact that the same pattern appeared in many systems increases the external validity of these results because it reduces the chance that this pattern is an artifact of any particular system.
In the past, these debates about external validity were frequently just a bunch of people sitting in a room trying to imagine what would have happened if the procedures were done in a different way, or in a different place, or with different people.
The idea of mediators is captured by what I call mechanisms, andthe idea of moderators is captured by what I call external validity(e.g., would the results of the experiment be different if it were run in different situations) and heterogeneity of treatment effects(e.g., are the effects larger for some people than for others).
In the past, these debates about external validity were frequently just a bunch of people sitting in a room trying to imagine what would have happened if the procedures were done in a different way, or in a different place, or with different people.
The idea of mediators is captured by what I call mechanisms, andthe idea of moderators is captured by what I call external validity(e.g., would the results of the experiment be different if it were run in different situations) and heterogeneity of treatment effects(e.g., are the effects larger for some people than for others).
In the past, these debates about external validity frequently involved nothing more than a group of people sitting in a room trying to imagine what would have happened if the procedures had been done in a different way, or in a different place, or with different participants.
In the past, these debates about external validity frequently involved nothing more than a group of people sitting in a room trying to imagine what would have happened if the procedures had been done in a different way, or in a different place, or with different participants.
To prove the validity of external criteria, there are four types: performance criteria- these are criteria such as the number of tasks completed, the time spent on training;