Examples of using External validity in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Maintaining internal and especially external validity.
Internal and external validity of experiments.
It is desirable to designexperiments that have a sufficient degree of internal and external validity.
Internal and external validity in experimental research.
The ability to transfer the results obtained in the study to real life depends on how high andgood external validity is.
One aspect of external validity is the setting where an intervention is tested.
Fortunately, the digital age enables researchers to move beyond these data-free speculations andassess external validity empirically.
The concepts of internal and external validity were first introduced in Campbell(1957).
External validity summarizes the findings of the population, the situation and other independent variables.
The concepts of internal and external validity were first introduced by Campbell(1957).
External validity- the extent to which the results of a study can be generalized to other situations and to other people or populations.
The fact that the same pattern appeared in many systems increases the external validity of these results because it reduces the chance that this pattern is an artifact of any particular system.
See Shadish, Cook, and Campbell(2001) for a more detailed history and a careful elaboration of statistical conclusion validity, internal validity, construct validity, and external validity.
One aspect of external validity is the setting in which an intervention is tested.
Compared to analog age experiments,in digital age experiments it should be easier to address external validity empirically and it should be easier to ensure internal validity. .
Finally, external validity centers around whether the results of this experiment would generalize to other situations.
Compared with analog-age experiments, in digital-age experiments,it should be easier to address external validity empirically, and it should also be easier to ensure internal validity. .
Finally, external validity centers around whether the results of this experiment can be generalized to other situations.
See Shadish, Cook, and Campbell(2001) for a more detailed history and a careful elaboration of statistical conclusion validity, internal validity, construct validity, and external validity.
Finally, external validity centers around whether the results of this experiment can be generalized to other situations.
The four types of validity- statistical conclusion validity, internal validity, construct validity, and external validity- provide a mental checklist to help researchers assess whether the results from a particular experiment support a more general conclusion.
Another aspect of external validity is whether alternative operationalizations of the same intervention will have similar effects.
The fact that the same pattern appeared in many systems increases the external validity of these results because it reduces the chance that this pattern is an artifact of any particular system.
In the past, these debates about external validity were frequently just a bunch of people sitting in a room trying to imagine what would have happened if the procedures were done in a different way, or in a different place, or with different people.
The idea of mediators is captured by what I call mechanisms,and the idea of moderators is captured by what I call external validity(e.g., would the results of the experiment be different if it were run in different situations) and heterogeneity of treatment effects(e.g., are the effects larger for some people than for others).
In the past, these debates about external validity frequently involved nothing more than a group of people sitting in a room trying to imagine what would have happened if the procedures had been done in a different way, or in a different place, or with different participants.
The idea of mediators is captured by what I call mechanisms,and the idea of moderators is captured by what I call external validity(e.g., would the results of the experiment be different if it were run in different situations) and heterogeneity of treatment effects(e.g., are the effects larger for some people than for others).
In the past, these debates about external validity frequently involved nothing more than a group of people sitting in a room trying to imagine what would have happened if the procedures had been done in a different way, or in a different place, or with different participants.