Examples of using Destruction programmes in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Status and progress of destruction programmes(art. 3).
The United Nations facilitates and promotes various surplus weapons/ammunition destruction programmes.
Scrap recycling 46. Recycling the scrap from weapons destruction programmes has had indifferent results in terms of cost recovery, but there have been some exceptions.
In addition, since the Nairobi Summit the UN supported stockpile destruction programmes.
How many anti- personnel mineshave we? Of what type? How far have the destruction programmes got? Obviously, publication of such information would help to build confidence among States parties.
People also translate
Taking into account logistical, technical,financial and environmental considerations in planning the stockpile destruction programmes;
Financial support for the Albanian and Libyan stockpile destruction programmes was provided by the United States.
The documents also showed that Iraq had used chemical weaponsfacilities to support other weapons of mass destruction programmes.
Notes 1 Large destruction programmes(more than 20,000 tons) specifically targeted at ammunition and explosives would make environmentally sound destruction a practical and cost-effective option.
The following information is general background datathat would be useful in setting up, and providing oversight of, munitions destruction programmes.
(iv) Providing information to the United Nations Secretary-General regarding destruction programmes of surplus, confiscated or collected weapons;
Hence, there now 156 States Parties which no longer hold stocks of anti-personnel mines because they never did orhave completed their destruction programmes.
For example, a rise in military expenditure might include funds for the disposal of outdated military material,weapon destruction programmes, better training or improved conditions for military personnel, or demining activities.
Hence, 152 States Parties now no longer hold stocks of anti-personnel mines,either because they never did or because they have completed their destruction programmes.
They also explained that costs for countries which had already developed waste management systems would be lower and that,if ozone-depleting substance destruction programmes were more generally targeted, costs could be spread over chemicals and applications with different cost effectiveness.
In addition to adherence to the principles discussed in section I above, there are a number of otherconsiderations to be reviewed when developing destruction programmes.
The United States utilizes the USAID disarmament, demobilization andrehabilitation programme as well as the DOS small arms/light weapons destruction programmes within the disarmament, demobilization and rehabilitation initiative to address the relationship between development and proliferation.
Hence, there remain 152 States Parties that now no longer hold stocks of anti-personnel mines,either because they never did or because they have completed their destruction programmes.
We appreciate the difficulties that somepossessor States are experiencing with regard to the destruction programmes of their chemical weapons stockpiles.
In total, 152 States Parties no longer held stockpiled anti-personnel mines other than those mines States Parties are permitted to retain for purposes permitted under Article 3,either because they never did or because they had completed their stockpile destruction programmes.
As for the destruction of weapons, my country will contributesubstantial sums to finance chemical weapons destruction programmes in the Russian Federation.
(ii) Encouraging States parties to maintain transparency as an important element for the full implementation of Article3 by providing clear information on the status and progress of stockpile destruction programmes.
The Standing Committee suggested that article 7 reports might be a useful tool forproviding more detailed information on stockpile destruction programmes and for seeking or offering technical assistance.
As of 3 December 2004, all States Parties whose deadlines for destruction hadoccurred by that time reported completion of their stockpile destruction programmes.
Canada has already pledged to contribute to such a fund, while Canada andthe GICHD have pledged to assist in planning stockpile destruction programmes with technical/expert advice.
At the close of the 12MSP, 154 States Parties no longer held stocks of anti-personnel mines(other than anti-personnel mines that States Parties are permitted to retain under Article 3),either because they never held stocks or because they had completed their destruction programmes.
It is critical to emphasize at the outset that the information in the present report, and in the field reference manual, is for planners and managers tasked to develop plans for,and provide oversight of, destruction programmes.
Hence, 152 States Parties no longer held stocks of anti-personnel mines other than mines that States Parties are permitted to retain under Article 3,either because they never did or because they had completed their destruction programmes.
At the close of the 11MSP, 154 States Parties no longer held stocks of anti-personnel mines other than small quantities of previously unknown stocks discovered after deadlines had expired and anti-personnel mines that States Parties are permitted to retain under Article 3,either because they never held stocks or because they had completed their destruction programmes.