Examples of using Explained in the commentary in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Political
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
This could be explained in the commentary.
Therefore, China suggested that the word“intention” should be explained in the commentary.
This will be explained in the commentary.
It was agreed that the meaning of the definitions should be explained in the commentary.
However, it has, as explained in the commentary to draft principle 3 above, its own limitations and needs to be employed with flexibility.
It was agreed that those terms should be explained in the commentary.
As explained in the commentary, such freedom was also enjoyed by a State or an international organization which had previously raised an objection to the reservation.
These agreements must operate electronically, as is explained in the commentary to article 59 below.
(8) As explained in the commentary to article 12 on Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts,the reference in paragraph 1 to the character of the obligation concerns the“various classifications of international obligations”.
It was widely felt that the matter needed to be explained in the commentary of the Annex.
Subparagraph(b) had been amended in order to focus on the principle, explained in the commentary, that the decision to extend the duration of the detention of an alien for the purpose of expulsion could be taken only by a court or by another authority, subject to judicial review.
Even assuming a satisfactory formulation of article 27 along the lines explained in the commentary, substantive issues remain.
Mr. ROSENSTOCK(Expert Consultant)said that the inclusion of the words" and of their waters" was explained in the commentary to article 1.
Although there are obligations of prevention in the sense explained in the commentary, it is clear that article 22(2) of the 1961 Convention is not such an obligation.
(1) The text of article 14 corresponds to article 18 on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts,with changes similar to those explained in the commentary to article 12. The reference to a coercing State has been replaced with that to an international organization; moreover, the coerced entity is not necessarily a State, but could also be an international organization. Also the title has been modified from“Coercion of another State” to“Coercion of a State or another international organization”.
In its commentary to article 4,the Commission had stated that the meaning of the term" significant" was explained in the commentary to article 3.
By contrast, in the form presented by articles 20 and 21 and explained in the commentary, the distinction is drawn on the basis of determinacy, not risk.
(1) The text of draft article 13 corresponds to article 17 on Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts,with changes similar to those explained in the commentary to draft article 12.
It is true that, as one Government commented, such inviolability may not exist" in allcircumstances"; but it should be explained in the commentary that what is preserved is precisely the obligation to respect inviolability as it exists between the two States in accordance with the applicable rules of international law.
(1) The text of article 15 corresponds to article 17 on the responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts,for reasons similar to those explained in the commentary on article 14 of the present draft articles.
There may be paper or electronic media or combinationof both, as further explained in the commentary to article 5 in the Guide.
Concerning the topic of immunity of State officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction, Mexico was pleased that the draft articles had made it clear that immunity was granted to the troika of Heads of State, Heads of Government and ministers for foreign affairs.It also noted that, as explained in the commentary, if the parties wished to establish a binding interpretation through a subsequent agreement, that could be done without prejudice to the meaning and scope to be given to article 31, paragraph 3(a).
Nonetheless, in accordance with Sir Francis Vallat ' s proposal, the Commission finally deleted this requirement from the final draft article for pragmatic reasons, which it explains in the commentary to the corresponding article adopted on second reading in 1974.
He suggested that, in order to ensure consistency with that Convention,the Committee should maintain that definition and explain in the commentary why UNCITRAL believed that new products developed since the Convention ' s entry into force would fall within the definition of financial contract as" similar" transactions.