Examples of using Partial implementation of measures in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Both States indicated partial implementation of measures providing for independence and adequacy of human and financial resources of such bodies.
Of the 17 States with maritime borders, there is a lack of information with respect to 10, and 7 have reported only partial implementation of measures to ensure port and ship security.
Kyrgyzstan reported partial implementation of measures criminalizing active bribery and no criminalization of passive bribery of international public officials.
China(including Hong Kong) also reported full compliance with the provision under review, while Mongolia, Pakistan,Tajikistan and Yemen reported partial implementation of measures providing for verification of identity and enhanced scrutiny.
Turkey indicated partial implementation of measures enabling competent national authorities to give effect to a request for confiscation received by another State party(art. 55, para. 1).
Belarus, Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland,Romania and Slovakia reported full implementation, while the Russian Federation indicated partial implementation, of measures enabling competent national authorities to return confiscated property upon request by another State party(art. 57, para. 2).
Serbia reported partial implementation of measures to require financial institutions to verify the identity of their customers and apply enhanced scrutiny, as prescribed in paragraph 1, and cited applicable legislation.
Out of the 12 reporting parties, Finland, the Netherlands and the United States reported full implementation of the article under review, while Austria, Canada, France, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden,Turkey and the United Kingdom reported partial implementation of measures to prevent and detect the transfer of proceeds of crime.
China quoted the relevant legislation and indicated partial implementation of measures establishing active bribery as a criminal offence(para.(a)) and full criminalization of passive bribery(para.(b)).
Bolivia, reporting partial implementation of measures to criminalize the acquisition or possession of property proceeds of crime, stated that the range of predicate offences subject to anti-money-laundering legislation was limited to drug trafficking, corruption and organized crime.
Kenya, Mauritania and Sierra Leone reported partial implementation of measures regarding public procurement personnel, as prescribed by paragraph 1(e), while Togo indicated that no such measures had been taken.
To overcome its partial implementation of measures for direct recovery of property as set forth in article 53, Armenia requested specific technical assistance that was not available at the time of reporting.
El Salvador reported full implementation, and Bolivia and Paraguay partial implementation, of measures providing for the criminalization of the use of inducement, threats or force to interfere with witnesses or officials in relation to criminal proceedings.
Reporting partial implementation of measures providing for the criminalization of the conversion, transfer, acquisition, possession or use of property proceeds of crime(art. 23, subparas. 1(a) and(b)), Bangladesh indicated that no assistance was required to ensure full implementation. .
The United Republic of Tanzania indicated partial implementation of measures to permit its competent authorities to give effect to orders of confiscation issued by courts of another State party(art. 54, subpara. 1(a)) and to freeze or seize property upon request(art. 54, subpara. 2(b)).
Australia indicated partial implementation of measures allowing for the confiscation of property acquired through corruption without a criminal conviction, as prescribed in the non-mandatory provision of paragraph 1(c), and stated that, while under its Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987, a conviction for an offence was required before an order could be registered, under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, action to confiscate property without a criminal conviction might be initiated.
Kyrgyzstan, reporting partial implementation of measures providing for the disposal of confiscated property including by return to its prior legitimate owner(art. 57, para. 1), stated that no assistance was required to fully implement such measures. .
Guatemala did, however, report partial implementation of measures to permit its courts to order the payment of compensation or damages to another State party pursuant to subparagraph(b) and indicated the need for specific forms of technical assistance that were not available at the time of reporting.
Both Kenya and Mauritania reported partial implementation of measures concerning timely reporting on revenue and expenditure and a system of accounting and auditing standards and related oversight, as prescribed by paragraphs 2(b) and(c), while Sierra Leone did not provide information on the implementation of those provisions(an obligatory reporting item).
Mauritius also reported partial implementation of such measures, but did not provide an account of its applicable legislation(an obligatory reporting item).
Angola, Kenya, Mauritania, Sierra Leone and Togo reported partial implementation of these measures.
Burkina Faso reported partial implementation of such measures and highlighted the importance of involving civil society in the development of anti-corruption policies.
Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, the Dominican Republic and Paraguay reported partial implementation of such measures. Chile, reporting compliance with the paragraph under review, did not provide information on procedures for the adoption of the national budget(an obligatory reporting requirement).
Argentina and the Dominican Republic reported partial implementation of such measures, while all the other respondents indicated no implementation. .
Finland, the Netherlands and Turkey indicated partial implementation of such measures, while Spain did not report on the implementation of the entire article under review(an obligatory reporting requirement).
The Dominican Republic and El Salvador reported partial implementation of such measures, while Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay reported no implementation. .
In relation to subparagraph 2(e) and paragraph 3 of article 9,Jordan reported partial implementation of corrective measures upon failure to comply with the provisions of paragraph 2 of article 9 and of measures to prevent the falsification of public expenditure records, while Kyrgyzstan reported no adoption of such measures. .
Armenia and Azerbaijan indicated that they had not taken measures to permit the confiscation of property acquired through corruption without a criminal conviction(non-mandatory provision, para. 1(c)),while Serbia reported partial implementation of such measures and described its relevant legislative framework.
Concerning measures to permit their courts or competent authorities to recognize another State party ' s claim of legitimate ownership of property proceeds of crime, as prescribed by paragraph(c), Armenia,Azerbaijan and Hungary reported partial implementation of such measures.
The number of reports submitted to date provides only a partial picture regarding the implementation of the measures set out in the resolutions.