Examples of using Rules would in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
In fact, some rules would obviously be duplicated.
Because of the differing situations and needs of countries, those rules would be interpreted in different ways.
Those rules would certainly be abrogated once the sanctions were lifted.
Further, it was recalled that the 1976 version of theRules did not contain any presumption that the Rules would be subject to amendments.
The rules would thus be an appendix to the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. .
People also translate
The issue as the United States saw it was which set of rules would govern the process by which the secured creditor enforced its security right.
New rules would also be instituted to ensure the independence of the auditors of those financial statements.
At the first Colloquium, it had been recognized that all the rules would basically be addressed to judges, and that judges should be involved in the discussions.
These rules would have no impact in a federal State whose constitution provides that secured transaction matters are governed by federal laws.
The revisions were aimed at enhancing the efficiency of arbitration, and the Rules would certainly continue to contribute to the development of harmonious international economic relations.
The Rules would be effective if they served to ensure that the rights of the disputing parties were not violated and that no undue pressure was brought to bear on the parties or the arbitration proceeding itself.
Although each Main Committee has authority over its own rules of procedure,we believe that streamlining and standardizing some of the rules would boost the efficiency of the work of the Committees.
They argue that such rules would be particularly important to ensure the effective opening of government procurement markets.
The transparency rules represented a compromise among different interests,a central aspect of that compromise being that the rules would apply only to future investment agreements.
So, for example, these rules would have no impact in a federal State whose constitution provides that secured transaction matters are governed by federal laws.
Mr. Peersman(Netherlands), referring to chapter VI of the report, said that two basic problems before the Commission were the definition of unilateral acts andwhether a single set of rules would cover a wide range of acts.
The Working Group was cautioned that anychange to the majority requirement in the 1976 version of the Rules would be a major departure and might also change the dynamics of the decision-making process of the arbitral tribunal.
Thirdly, judges felt that the rules would be of assistance to Member States for the purpose of enacting or amending national legislation where necessary in order to comply with the obligation, contained in the statute and in Security Council resolution 827(1993), to cooperate with the Tribunal in all aspects of its operations and proceedings.
He shared the general view that, at the current stage, the Working Group on Electronic Commerce should not be distracted from the preparation of draft uniform rules on the legal issues of digital signatures and certification authorities andthat it should assume that those rules would take the form of draft legislative provisions; the technical background of electronic commerce was changing so rapidly that it would be premature to embark on drafting a convention.
The reason for favouring the incentives as anintegral part of the financial rules was that the rules would then contain a clear mechanism and an institutional framework based on stable criteria and non-discriminatory procedures under which uniform and predetermined incentives would be provided automatically in compliance with conditions detailed in advance.
A suggestion was made to include in the commentary the clarification that(i) an" award" would be applicable only to arbitration;(ii) that the Rules would need to resolve issues relating to the prohibition on binding, pre-dispute agreements toarbitrate in a number of jurisdictions; and(iii) that the Rules would recognize that, in addition to arbitration, another path would exist, including mediation-only, or adjudication.
Thus, such a rule would have limited application until wide adoption of law that would be consistent with the law recommended in the Guide.
It was further said that such a rule would be alternative to those on avoidance and set-off in the group context.
However, since the State could always withdraw the reservation, the rule would be of little practical interest.
The rule would then be consistent with many other institutional rules and would also deal with a number of issues that had arisen under the 1976 Arbitration Rules. .
On the contrary, it has been argued that such a rule would increase the number of claims by developed nations on behalf of their nationals holding shares in companies doing business in developing States.
The Working Group thought that such a rule would make credit less expensive than if the risk was borne by the assignee, where the higher cost would fall on the debtor and the assignor.
It was stated that such a rule would be in line with article 12 of the Rome Convention referring to the law which applied to the contract between the assignor and the debtor.
This rule would be displaced though by a rule of law relating to intellectual property giving priority to a secured creditor that took a security right in intellectual property without knowledge of a prior transfer of the intellectual property by the grantor(see recommendation 4, subpara.(b)).
A mere reference to thepossibility of parties reaching an agreement contrary to this rule would not have been sufficient to reconcile these two concerns: quite apart from the fact that all the guidelines in the Guide to Practice are only indicative and parties remain free to depart from them by(valid) agreement inter se, it is extremely doubtful whether an agreement could be said to have come about merely because the other parties all remain silent.