Examples of using Rules would in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
What rules would that be?
Anyone who cannot follow these rules would be kicked out.
The rules would thus be foreseeable and known in advance.
I mean, now that we're all here,Having some rules would be nice.
The rules would thereby provide strong incentives for responsible fiscal behaviour.
People also translate
Moving towards a single set of rules would help achieve this.
Such rules would need to have stringent legal force, presumably at constitutional level.
The legislative adaptation arising from new EC rules would therefore vary.
Breaking its rules would mean taking a risk- that is why artists are the risk element of the society.
The proposal assumes that this alternative set of rules would stimulate more cross-border business.
The Rules would become directly applicable across the EU after agreement by the European Parliament and Council.
To leave the participating Member States any room for discretion in implementing these rules would jeopardise the objectives of legal certainty and predictability.
This set of rules would be adopted in two different legislative acts, one for the EU and one for Euratom FPs.
The goal of the proposal is to enhance growth and trade in the internal market on the basis of freedom of contract anda high level of consumer protection assuming that this alternative set of rules would stimulate more cross-border business.
These new rules would make the international financial system more responsible and transparent and make it possible to limit speculation.
Alternatively, equipment listed in CRATE could be used for this purpose also, but the rules would need to be reviewed in order to ensure speedy and unconditional availability of the equipment for the RABIT teams.
These rules would be imposed across the European Union, removing the flexibility for national governments to respond with different policies in the future.
Lastly, it is very important to point out that the application of working time rules to self-employed drivers is ineffectual and very difficult to achieve, since these drivers do not have to record their working time for salary purposes,not to mention the fact that the administrative costs of applying such rules would be very high.
Non-harmonised rules would impair the internal market, lead to poor information and reduce the level of consumer protection.
It should thus be possible to establish special rules on jurisdiction providing a supranational framework for such cases, in contrast with the current situation, as set out in Article 4 of Regulation(EC) No. 44/2001,which refers the decision to the national courts, although these rules would still be subject to the exceptions laid down in Articles 22 and 23 of the same regulation.
Better application of the rules would prevent sizeable losses for consumers, which are estimated at 0.16% of the European Union's gross domestic product(GDP).
Such rules would encourage TSOs to channel their investments into better cross-border interconnections of the transmission grids.
Let us be certain whether our existing rules would have prevented it happening here, and let us be certain that any new rules would prevent it happening.
Any such rules would need to comply with the principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties and be consistent with existing legislation on the protection of personal data13.
Some have suggested that these rules would give too many rights to private companies and unduly limit the EU's and Member States' right to regulate.
Rules would become clearer and more comprehensive and the whole process should be simplified as the role of each administration would be clearly defined, thus eliminating overlaps and streamlining the process of authorisation of fishing activities.
A single set of rules would reduce the administrative burden for entities participating in different actions as it would lower learning costs.
These new rules would increase the efficiency and effectiveness of cross-border insolvency proceedings, affecting an estimated 50 000 companies across the EU every year.
Uniform application of the rules would call for a single copyright jurisdiction with its own tribunal, so that inconsistent case law does not lead to more fragmentation.
Such rules would reward operators that have taken early action to reduce greenhouse gases, would better reflect the polluter pays principle and would give stronger incentives to reduce emissions, as allocations would no longer depend on historical emissions.