Examples of using Unilateral commitments in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Statements purporting to undertake unilateral commitments.
We have accepted unilateral commitments on non-proliferation, and we have acted on those commitments. .
Statements purporting to undertake unilateral commitments.
It proves that the unilateral commitments made by nuclear-weapon States could never prevent a nuclear war.
Draft guideline1.4.1(Statements purporting to undertake unilateral commitments).
They cover breaches of obligations under unilateral commitments or bilateral treaties as well as obligations erga omnes.
Extensive" statements or statements purporting to undertake unilateral commitments;
These unilateral commitments were a part of efforts to secure the indefinite extension of the NPT at the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference.
These" certificates" would constitute binding unilateral commitments under international law;
If transparency measures could be agreed,a further step would be to formalize and verify those unilateral commitments.
In addition to the above recommendations, the following unilateral commitments and undertakings were formulated.
In addition to those unilateral commitments, the Philippines had closely and carefully studied the recommendations made by various States during its review, which are contained in paragraph 58 of the report of the Working Group.
The same body of opinion holds that" thus,with regard to the fundamental requirement of stability in international relations, unilateral commitments offer guarantees of solidity comparable to those of treaty commitments".
Those organizations should be able to enter into unilateral commitments with States and other international organizations, and the issues raised by such acts must therefore be addressed mutatis mutandis in the light of the 1986 Convention.
If the obligation assumed is less than that provided for by the treaty, the case is covered by guideline 1.1.2, and the unilateral declaration constitutes a reservation; if it is heavier,it is a statement purporting to undertake unilateral commitments, which is not a reservation.
We are pleased to have heard the nuclear Powers today reaffirming the unilateral commitments made previously, but we continue to believe that these arrangements do not measure up to the security requirements of non-nuclear-weapon States.
If the obligation assumed is less than that provided for by the treaty, the case is one covered by draft guideline 1.1.5[1.1.6](reservations purporting to limit the obligations of their author); if it is heavier,it is a statement purporting to undertake unilateral commitments, which are not reservations according to draft guideline 1.4.1[1.1.5].
In this regard, the Conference welcomes the unilateral commitments of the Russian Federation and the United States of America to undertake deep cuts[significant reductions] in the area of tactical nuclear weapons and strategic delivery systems.
They clarify the meaning of the word" modify" as used in the guidelines that define reservations(1.1) and specify their object(1.1.1),as do the draft guidelines on statements purporting to undertake unilateral commitments(1.4.1) and on unilateral statements purporting to add further elements to a treaty(1.4.2).
India has already made unilateral commitments in this regard and would exhort other nuclear weapon States to do so in the interim, while the international community works towards converting these into legal obligations.
Reference was also made to the recommendation of the High-level Panel that permanent members should pledge themselves, in their individual capacities, to refrain from the use of the veto in cases of genocide and large-scale human rights abuses. f The view was also expressed,however, that unilateral commitments from permanent members on the use of the veto were, generally speaking, not a viable option to address the issue.
At the same time,we cannot but express our regret about the fact that the unilateral commitments to refrain from conducting nuclear-test explosions are not being maintained by all. Some of the nuclear-weapon States have decided to change their policies in this field.
Draft guidelines 1.1.5 and 1.1.6 were satisfactory in substance, but he doubted whether both were necessary, given that the effect of both was to clarify the meaning of the term" modify" in the definition of reservations in draft guideline 1.1. The same clarification could be found in draft guideline 1.4.1,on statements purporting to undertake unilateral commitments, and in draft guideline 1.4.2, on unilateral statements purporting to add further elements to a treaty.
Draft guideline 1.4.1 referred to statements to undertake unilateral commitments, in other words obligations going beyond those imposed upon the declarant by the treaty, which were neither reservations nor interpretative declarations.
Unilateral commitments, such as the presidential nuclear initiatives made by the United States and the Soviet Union/Russian Federation in 1991 and 1992, have led to the decommissioning and(partial) abolition of certain types of non-strategic nuclear weapons and a significant reduction of such weapons.
As the Commission itself stated,those organizations should be able to enter into unilateral commitments with States and other international organizations, and the issue raised by such acts must therefore be addressed mutatis mutandis in the light of the 1986 Convention.
Defining them as“unilateral commitments”, an expression which is deliberately rather neutral from the legal point of view and which should be read in conjunction with the phrase“purports to undertake obligations”, is an attempt to suggest such a positive definition.
For the nuclear- weapon States, membership of a cut-off convention would confirm the unilateral commitments already made by four of these States to cease producing weapons- grade fissile material, and codify this commitment into a general ban on such production.
In fact, virtually all of them have made unilateral commitments in this regard,and therefore it should not present a problem to convert these unilateral commitments on negative security assurances into bilateral and multilateral understandings.
In which circumstances and under which conditions can the unilateral commitment be modified or withdrawn?