Examples of using Contested decision must in English and their translations into Danish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
The contested decision must be annulled.
Accordingly, as the criteria for the application of Article 86(2) EC, as defined by the Commission itself,have not been complied with, the contested decision must be annulled.
The contested decision must therefore be annulled.
As that assertion constitutes… an essential ground on which the Commission concluded… that there was no collective dominant position, the[contested decision] must be annulled on that ground alone.
The applicant claims that the contested decision must be examined together with Decision No 91/176, as the facts and elements relating to the latter are the same.
In view of all the foregoing considerations, the plea alleging an error in applying the concept of State aid is unfounded, and the application of UFEX andOthers for annulment of the contested decision must therefore be dismissed.
Accordingly, the contested decision must be annulled for unlawful failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC.
Therefore, the third branch of the third plea in law must also be upheld and, consequently, the contested decision must be annulled without it being necessary to rule on the other pleas in law submitted by the applicants.
As the contested decision must be assessed with regard not only to its wording but also to its context, it is clear that the Commission adopted the decision on the basis of the Fifth Code.
The Member States may provide that where damages are claimed on the grounds that a decision was taken unlawfully, the contested decision must first be set aside by a body having the necessary powers.
In my view, the contested decision must, therefore, be annulled in so far as it imposes on the Kingdom of Belgium a 2% flatrate reduction in the expenditure declared for the purposes of EAGGF Guarantee Section financing.
In those circumstances, without it being necessary for the Court to rule on the second plea put forward by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the contested decision must be annulled in so far as it finds that the measure in question constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC.
It follows that the contested decision must be annulled for defective reasoning in so far as it concludes that the logistical and commercial assistance provided by La Poste to SFMI-Chronopost does not constitute State aid.
Thus, in paragraph 335 of the judgment, the Court of First Instance stated, among other things, that‘the findings set out in the[contested decision] must be compatible with the findings of fact made in the statement of objections, in so far as it is not established that the latter findings were incorrect.
Accordingly the contested decision must be annulled in so far as it refuses to authorise access to documents emanating from the Commission without there being any need to consider the other pleas raised by the applicant in that connection.
Where damages are claimed on the grounds that a decision has been taken unlawfully, Member States may, where their system of internal law so requires and provides bodies having the necessarypowers for that purpose, provide that the contested decision must first be set aside or declared illegal.
The Court finds that the contested decision must be annulled, inasmuch as the Board of Appeal was wrong to refuse to examine the applicant's arguments based on Article 7(3) of Regulation No 40/94.
L& D v OHIM that the mark was contrary to public policy and accepted principles of morality within the meaning of Article 7(1)(f) of the Regulation.The Court dismissed the plea as immaterial on the ground that Article 7(1)(f)‘is not one of the provisions in relation to which the legality of the contested decision must be appraised'. It reasoned as follows. 61.
In those circumstances, the contested decision must be annulled rather than altered so that the Office may take the measures necessary to comply with the present judgment, pursuant to Article 63(6) of Regulation No 40/94.
It concluded, in paragraph 101 of the judgment under appeal,‘that the contested decision must be annulled for defective reasoning in so far as it concludes that the logistical and commercial assistance provided by La Poste to SFMI-Chronopost does not constitute State aid.
Having regard to the foregoing considerations, the contested decision must be annulled to the extent that the Commission decided that the compensation paid to the applicant for losses caused by the cancellation of the 15 September 2001 flight to Canada was not compatible with the common market.
The communications provided for in Article 3 of the contested decisions must inform resellers that in application of this Order the exclusive purchasing agreements may be relied upon against Langnese and Schöl1er;
With regard to the content of the contested decision, it must be observed that it fixes a financial contribution and technical assistance amounting to EUR 515 000 for a term of 12 months to set up the Light Weapons Unit within the ECOWAS Technical Secretariat and to convert the ECOWAS moratorium on the importation, exportation and manufacture of small arms into a legally binding convention.
