Examples of using Conditional interpretative declaration in English and their translations into French
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Conditional interpretative declaration 277.
Late formulation of a conditional interpretative declaration.
Conditional interpretative declaration 277.
Late formulation or modification of a conditional interpretative declaration.
A conditional interpretative declaration must be formulated in writing.
Conditions for the permissibility of a conditional interpretative declaration.
The conditional interpretative declaration is in fact a conditional reservation.
Competence to assess the permissibility of a conditional interpretative declaration.
A conditional interpretative declaration produces the same effects as a reservation in conformity with guidelines 4.1 to 4.6.
According to the definition contained in guideline 1.2.1, a conditional interpretative declaration is.
Effects of a conditional interpretative declaration.
Draft guidelines 3.5.3 Competence to assess the permissibility of a conditional interpretative declaration.
Withdrawal of a conditional interpretative declaration.
In both cases the widening is understood as the late formulation of a new reservation or a new conditional interpretative declaration.
Effects of a conditional interpretative declaration.
Since a conditional interpretative declaration had the same effect as a reservation, it was quite natural that the draft articles should accord it the same treatment as a reservation.
It is that element of conditionality that brings a conditional interpretative declaration closer to being a reservation.
Thus, any conditional interpretative declaration potentially constitutes a reservation: a reservation conditional upon a certain interpretation.
When a treaty prohibited reservations to itself,States could still make a conditional interpretative declaration to the treaty, having the same legal effect as a reservation.
A conditional interpretative declaration had effects very similar to those of a reservation and when formulated by a State could call in question its commitment to the treaty in question.
In any event,maintaining a distinction between"interpretative declaration" and"conditional interpretative declaration" complicated the response provided by the Guide to the effects of silence.
A conditional interpretative declaration must be communicated in writing to the contracting States and contracting organizations and other States and international organizations entitled to become parties to the treaty under the same conditions as a reservation.
If, on the other hand,the treaty prohibits reservations, but not interpretative declarations, a conditional interpretative declaration is considered non-valid since it does not meet the conditions for the validity of a reservation.
In this case-- but in this case only-- the conditional interpretative declaration must be equated to a reservation and may produce only the effects of a reservation, if the corresponding conditions have been met.
Although some of the reasons that had led the Special Rapporteur to establish the distinction were clear,the category of"conditional interpretative declaration" was contrived, appearing to be a tertium genus between an authentic interpretative declaration and a reservation.
In this case- butin this case only the conditional interpretative declaration produces the effects of a reservation, if the corresponding conditions have been met.
Formal confirmation of a conditional interpretative declaration must also be made in writing.
The validity or non-validity of the conditional interpretative declaration as an"interpretative declaration" has no practical effect.
In other cases,she considers that the conditional interpretative declaration may never modify the treaty provisions ibid., pp. 148-150.
So long as the correct interpretation has not been established, the conditional interpretative declaration remains in a legal vacuum and it is impossible to determine whether it is a mere interpretation or a reservation.