Examples of using Authorisation should in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
An authorisation should be regarded as a transitional phase.
Taking into account those considerations, authorisation should be granted for the products.
The authorisation should assume that proper organisation, qualified staff and adequate facilities and material are in place.
Some agreements such as construction agreements orloan facility agreements must be in a written form, therefore the authorisation should also be given in writing.
The authorisation should be granted for a period of 10 years, subject where appropriate to a post-market monitoring plan.
Novel foods authorised under the Regulation(EC)No 258/97 should maintain their novel food status but authorisation should be required for any new uses of such foods.
Moreover, authorisation should always be limited to a maximum of five years in order to promote innovation leading to safe alternatives.
However, when the conditions set out in Article 22(2) of Regulation(EC)No 1408/71 are fulfilled the authorisation should be granted and the benefits provided in accordance with that Regulation.
The authorisation should only be given if it is necessary for the purpose of management of assets, in particular for the operation of a trade or business.
The marketing authorisation holder would have to make effective use of the marketing authorisation, otherwise, if the product is notplaced on the community market after a certain period, the authorisation should cease to be valid.
Authorisation should henceforth be granted unless there are clearly specified grounds for refusal attributable to the applicant.
In line with the principles constituting the internal market the authorisation should be valid throughout the Community and no further authorisations for the transit through other Member States or for import in other Member States should be necessary.
That authorisation should not be granted for a single use either as food and feed in cases where such products are likely to be used both as food and feed.
Centralised authorisation should be restricted in essence to medicinal products which have already been authorised by the Agency hitherto under existing laws.
Authorisation should be given to projects which have an adverse impact on the environment, for reasons of overriding public interest, when all the conditions provided for under Directives 92/43/EC and 2000/60/EC are met.
The authorisation should therefore be extended for a further limited period, without prejudice to Commission Decision 2002/757/EC of 19 September 2002 on provisional emergency phytosanitary measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Community of Phytophthora ramorum Werres, De Cock& Man in't Veld sp.
Experience has shown that authorisation should not be granted for a single use, when a product is likely to be used both for food and feed purposes; therefore such products should only be authorised when fulfilling authorisation criteria for both food and feed.
National authorisations should not be subject to multiple counting.
Such temporary authorisations should be reviewed at Community level.
Such authorisations should be reviewed at Community level.
Time-limited authorisations should allow this review.
The listing of criteria for the granting of authorisations should be more precise.
To avoid unnecessary and cumbersome procedures, authorisations should be made compulsory only in the case of significant charges.
Authorisations should only be withdrawn when the EU has negotiated a new agreement with an identical level of protection.
Accordingly, authorisations should provide for the most adequate control compatible with the fulfilment of applicable requirements.
The criteria for granting such authorisations should be objective, transparent, non-discriminatory, relevant and proportional, and should be made public.
Exports under individual authorisations should be checked at the office of export and exit in accordance with Articles 788 to 796 of the Customs Code Implementing Provisions, preferably by a specialist.
Such authorisations should be granted only where there is reason to believe that the use of the forest reproductive material would, on account of its phenotypic or genetic characteristics, have an adverse effect on forestry, environment, genetic resources or biodiversity in the territory of that Member State.
Authorisations should be subject to minimum common criteria and a limited set of basic rules on the process of authorisation, to ensure transparency and equal opportunities when joining the EURES network, without prejudice to the flexibility necessary to take into account the different national models and forms of co-operation between public employment services and other labour market actors in the Member States.