Examples of using Comparative trials in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Community comparative trials.
The details shall be determined in the respective technical protocols for the Community comparative trials.
The CPVO attended several comparative trials in 2003.
Controlled comparative trials and long observation periods are more than just an indication of how successful this treatment is.
Comment: The most complete review of prospective comparative trials up to 2003.
Furthermore, comparative trials with foreign machinery will continue in a bid to make Russian agricultural machinery producers more competitive.
The aim of the proposal issimple- to create a clear legal basis for financing Community comparative trials.
In comparative trials with different doses of Ovitrelle, the following adverse reactions were found to be associated with Ovitrelle in a dose-related fashion: OHSS, vomiting and nausea.
The abovementioned Directive provides for thenecessary arrangement to be made for Community comparative trials and tests of propagating material to be carried out.
The efficacy of one infusion of 5 mg zoledronic acid versus daily doses of 30 mg risedronate for2 months was demonstrated in two 6-month comparative trials.
Synopsis: All mistletoe preparations; prospective comparative trials; systematic methodology; detailed criteria-based quality assessment; 23 trials identified; review in tabular form with discussion.
Where a Member State participates in the experiment,an appropriate proportion of the samples supplied by that Member State for Community comparative trials shall represent samples drawn under the experiment.
Community comparative trials and tests which began in 2004 on propagating material of Hosta Tratt. shall be continued in 2005 in accordance with Decision 2003/865/EC.
In order to harmonise technical methods of examination used in the Member States and to compare propagating materialproduced in the Community with those produced in third countries, comparative trials should be carried out to check compliance of propagating material with the requirements of this Directive;
Community comparative trials and tests which began in 2003 on propagating and planting material of Prunus domestica shall be continued in 2005 in accordance with Decision 2002/745/EC.
In order to harmonize the technical methods of examination used in the Member States and to compare propagating material andfruit plants produced in the Community with those produced in third countries, comparative trials should be carried out to check compliance of such products with the requirements of this Directive;
Decision 2001/898/EC sets out the arrangements for the comparative trials and tests to becarried out under Directive 98/56/EC as regards ornamental plants of Chamaecyparis, Ligustrum vulgare and Euphorbia fulgens from 2002 to 2004.
In comparative trials with the buffers advised by Darbyshire or Schoop and Wachendorfer(6)(Buffer phosphate M/100, pH 7.2 to 7.4, to which O. 5$ phenol had been added) agar with veronal gave a clearer and better picture.
Having regard to Commission Decision 2002/756/EC of 16September 2002 setting out the arrangements for Community comparative trials and tests on seeds and propagating material of certain plants under Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 68/193/EEC, 92/33/EEC, 2002/54/EC, 2002/55/EC, 2002/56/EC and 2002/57/EC(9), and in particular Article 4 thereof.
Community comparative trials and tests should be carried out in the years 2004 and 2005 on propagating material harvested in 2003, and the details of such trials and tests, the eligible costs as well as the maximum Community financial contribution should also be set out yearly by an agreement signed by the authorising officer of the Commission and the body responsible for carrying out of trials. .
Having regard to Commission Decision 2001/897/EC of 12December 2001 setting out the arrangements for Community comparative trials and tests on seeds and propagating material of certain plants under Council Directives 66/400/EEC, 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 66/403/EEC, 68/193/EEC, 69/208/EEC, 70/458/EEC and 92/33/EEC(13), and in particular Article 3 thereof.
Community comparative trials and tests which began in 2004 on seed and propagating material of Gramineae, Medicago sativa L. and Beta shall be continued in 2005 in accordance with Decision 2004/11/EC.
On the continuation in the year 2004 of Community comparative trials and tests on seeds and propagating material of gramineae, Triticum aestivum, Brassica napus and Allium ascalonicum under Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 68/193/EEC, 92/33/EEC, 2002/54/EC, 2002/55/EC, 2002/56/EC and 2002/57/EC started in 2003.
Community comparative trials and tests which began in 2004 on propagating and planting material of Prunus persica(L.) Batsch, Malus Mill. and Rubus idaeus L. shall be continued in 2005 in accordance with Decision 2003/894/EC.
EC comparative trial of maize 2000.
In studies SP824 and SP825 conducted since the initial comparative trial, rotigotine and ropinirole at equivalent doses were shown to have comparable efficacy.
In one comparative trial, combination therapy with nucleoside analogues(triple therapy with zidovudine plus didanosine) conferred protection against the selection of virus expressing at least one resistance.
In one comparative trial, combination therapy with nucleoside analogues(triple therapy with zidovudine plus didanosine) conferred protection against the selection of virus expressing at least one resistance- associated amino acid substitution to both indinavir(from 13/24 to 2/20 at therapy week 24) and to the nucleoside analogues from 10/16 to 0/20 at therapy week 24.