Examples of using Double majority in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
The double majority is one instrument, and there are others.
The European symbols, the title of Foreign Affairs Minister, the double majority voting within short deadlines- we regret all of that.
A double majority sounds easy but it is very difficult to use.
It is truly an important step; to use the double majority and a weighting which allows us to move forward and to function.
A double majority is achieved when a decision is taken by 55% of the Member States representing at least 65% of the Union's population.
As far as voting in the Council is concerned, I think that the double majority is the best system because it is more representative and more objective.
Obviously, double majority was a big issue- to bring everyone around to that as a basis in our efforts to make progress.
Our aspiration to become a genuine Union of States andPeoples is expressed in the double majority system proposed for Council decision-making.
Voting with'double majority': how does it work now according to Nice?
I believe that we must look at two possibilities:giving new weighting to the votes or creating a simple double majority system, as proposed by Mr Bourlanges.
The double majority system will reflect the twofold legitimacy of the Union, which is a union of peoples and of States.
Touching on a number of key issues, we have made clear ourview that only a voting system based on a double majority can command a consensus.
The double majority system could be interpreted as a signal that the European Union will not be enlarged over the next few decades.
I want to underline the factthat above all it includes the Charter of Fundamental Rights and introduces the double majority principle for Council decisions made by qualified majority. .
There is, however, a double majority, and this double majority brings the weighting between population and the'one country, one vote' principle.
We have noted the Italian Presidency's proposal regardingqualified majority voting, which is based on a double majority of citizens and States as in Article 1 of the Constitution.
The double majority(55% of Member States representing at least 65% of the population) will thus replace the complicated provisions of the Nice Treaty as of 2017.
Furthermore, Mr Giscard d'Estaing called for us not to‘torture', on the one hand, the double majority figures, and on the other, the range of subjects for which decisions can be made by qualified majority. .
If a double majority were achieved, of the citizens and of the Member States, we would have, after this historic vote, a genuine roadmap for all those who wish to follow it.
The situation is anticipated in the Treaty of Amsterdam in the form of a protocol which,by giving them a double majority or more votes in the Council, will compensate the five largest countries for the loss of their second Commissioner.
Regarding the voting system, the double majority rule, which stipulates that a decision must have the support of 55% of the Member States representing at least 65% of the EU population for it to be adopted, had been retained.
Concerning the weighting of votes, the two well-known systems also remain on the table: a simple re-weighting, in favourof which a narrow, very narrow majority is emerging, or a double majority system, but with alternative options, a double simple or double re-weighted majority, in other words a type of'demographic safety net.
The draft constitution had envisaged the double majority principle, according to which decisions require the approval of 55 percent of the Member States with at least 65 percent of the EU population.
A double majority would destroy the EU's culture of consensus, and the removal of the national Commissioners would make it difficult to get the EU to operate properly on a day-to-day basis.
To meet our citizens' expectations, we had advocated a double majority as the only solution that was objective, comprehensible and widely supported by smaller and larger countries alike.
The revision to a double majority, giving the demographic factor greater weight, will, however, come into force only in 2014, that is, at the same time as the first slimmed-down Commission, and with a transition period until 2017, but it will become reality.
Care must be taken, however, not to introduce any element into the double majority system that may cause confusion, as this would divest it of its major advantages from the public's point of view, namely, efficiency and clarity.
This double majority is radically different from certain proposals examined by the preceding Intergovernmental Conference, whereby the qualified majority would require both a qualified majority of the population and a qualified majority of the number of votes expressed.
We have succeeded in getting double majority accepted in principle; now, though,we must also have figures for the double majority, so that it enables greater decision-taking power.
In this way,we can be justified in our desire to see the double majority adopted in the long term, as this is a guideline that the vast majority of the House can ratify. But we will not go into detail regarding percentages here, as these should be studied at a later stage.