Examples of using Superstate in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Anyone who dreaded the emergence of a centralised, almighty'superstate' should be more than reassured.
Conservatives back home, however,are coming up with this idea that this Treaty sets up a superstate.
The call for“open borders” raised by some bourgeois liberals andleftist groups reflects illusions in the EU as a superstate, moreover one representing a“social Europe”; these are bourgeois myths.
I believe that Mr Kelly is right, and I would like to offer some reassurance to Lord Dartmouth,even if he has left the Chamber, who voiced fears about a superstate.
So, whether we like it or not, the almighty EU superstate will have plenty of fancy means to control our every movement and every uttered thought so as to secure its objectives.
People also translate
If there aren't many of them and they don't make sense in the WHDLoad environment(like exec. Disable()or exec. SuperState()) simply NOP($4e71) them.
NL If we considered the EU as one superstate instead of a collaborative association of free nations that want to solve their cross-border problems jointly, we have to note that this state is showing countless democratic shortcomings.
It will make it much easier for people to purchase andalso create a sense of European union without creating the superstate that the good Earl is somewhat concerned about.
The superstate does boast a directly elected parliament that can discuss everything, but unlike the national parliaments, this parliament has no right of initiative, nor does it have the last word in legislation, budget and the formation of coalition.
Mr President, the lesson of the Iraq war is not that weshould copy the United States and devise our own foreign policy, involving our own superstate army and military-industrial complex.
This is the result of the fact that we have a division of labour,because Europe is not a superstate, but is comprised of 27 sovereign Member States and will continue to operate like this under the new Lisbon Treaty too.
On the other hand, the whole enterprise smacks of efforts progressively to do precisely that, namely to create veritable EUembassies as a stage in the process of transforming the EU into a superstate.
And that this country was to supply financial power to an international superstate- a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure.
Since the rights of peoples are none other than human rights raised to the level of community life,because of the project to establish a superstate we are facing a human rights crisis in Europe.
Europe's future lies not in this totalitarian superstate, as we can see today in Kosovo, which should serve as an example, but in cooperation freely given between the nations and peoples of Europe, including the Slav nations.
It is now time to state the true significance of this vote:it says'enough is enough' to the Brussels Eurocrats who want to build a superstate far removed from the interest and soul of our citizens.
I must stress, Mr President, that the Commission is not a superstate and it cannot judge policies which are purely national policies and for which each Member State takes the specific measures which it feels it needs to take.
The purpose of this'carrot' would be to encourage parties to fit themselves into the mould of European status, even if that meant betraying both their original aims and the peoples they represent,in order to champion the superstate.
Hence the scandal that, across this continent,national powers will be stripped away, superstate structures will be established, a new EU citizenship will be created, legal personality will be bestowed on the EU and only a handful of citizens will ever be asked.
HU Mr President, the question that is being asked here at the moment, and what we are actually talkingabout, is whether, while progressing along the path determined by the Treaty of Lisbon, there will be a superstate initiative or 27 countries will have close institutional cooperation.
It seems to us impossible to integrate into the superstate which is being formed a country which is so profoundly different, and which, in the very short term, will have the largest population and therefore, no doubt, also the greatest number of votes in the Council and the largest number of Members of Parliament in our House.
Not only is this an insult to the Irish voters that rejected the Lisbon Treaty by a wide majority during the referendum, it is also an attempt to interpret the Lisbon Treaty in such away that it would'confer legal personality upon the EU', thus making it a superstate.
The sovereignty of each State,the reaffirmation that the European Union is not a superstate, Commissioner Reding, must not make us forget that the European Union also has a Charter of Fundamental Rights from which stems a legislative system that the Member States cannot ignore.
This pragmatic and future-looking approach, which is of enormous value, could give a fresh impetus to the development of Europe's nations and to cooperation between them,by supplanting the illusory idea of a superstate with a constitution, the latter being fortunately dead and buried.
Our own Prime Minister, Mr Tony Blair, his Foreign Secretary,Mr Cook and other British ministers may deny that a superstate is on its way, but when I hear proposals for our own police forces to be trained in a European approach to crime fighting and internal security, it is obvious that the writing is on the wall.
The excellent reports by Mr Duhamel and Mr Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado expertly point the way on both issues: improved intelligibility of the Treaties, a constitutional framework, fundamental rights, delimitation of competences, constitutional state,democracy and separation of powers; no superstate in Europe, a new method of developing the Treaties.
I would therefore like to ask whether this is what tolerance means in the European Union; a European Union in which a minority imposes its views on millions of citizens,and attempts to impose not only a superstate with one government, military and currency, but also a single legitimate ideology, something with which Poles are particularly familiar from their experience of previous totalitarian systems?
All your posturing about the completion of the internal market will not help to defuse the prejudice against the new treaty,which is prompting people to spread rumours about this being a superstate, a neoliberal concept, about the unbridled centralisation and militarisation of the EU, and this‘plan D' is doing nothing to lay these prejudices to rest.