Examples of using Devolution process in English and their translations into Greek
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Computer
The devolution process commenced immediately.
Concurrently with the CourtŐs audit,the Commission services carried out an evaluation of the devolution process.
However, the devolution process must be continuous.
This is undoubtedly a result of the increase in staff capacity provided as part of the devolution process.
The devolution process was completed in 2004(with a very few exceptions).
EC delegations are included in the devolution process in 2001, among them the delegation in Russia.
The toolbox of planning and monitoring instruments applied proved to be effective andappropriate for the management of the devolution process.
(1) Evaluation of the devolution process: final report Ń 6 May 2004 Ń SEC(2004) 561.
The audit covered the period since the completion of the devolution process in 2004 until 2009.
Detailed preparation of the devolution process started following the CommissionŐs Communication of May 2000.
(a) See reply to paragraph 58(a).(b) It is now more than 10 years since the devolution process was launched.
As part of the devolution process, the delegations have been strengthened to allow them to shoulder their full responsibilities.
Was the year in which the new Financial Regulation entered into force and the devolution process for the geographical programmes was completed.
The Commission's management of the devolution process can be considered reasonably successful, at least as far as the Delegations are concerned.
As to the reference to the United Kingdom,the Commission considers that the formulation should take into account the constitutional arrangements and devolution process prevailing in this Member State.
At the end of 2005, after the completion of the devolution process, the monitoring of costs will allow for a comparison with initial estimates.
The devolution process, which brings management closer to the work in the field, should also make the management of recovery orders more efficient.
Not having prepared, at an early stage, a complete set of performance indicators to monitor the devolution process, makes it difficult to measure progress against the main objectives.
Now that the devolution process is virtually complete at the level of the Delegations, there is a need to review these activities in a comprehensive manner.
The initial structure of EuropeAid was designed to ensure the stability of the organisation throughout the devolution process by opting for a predominantly geographical structure.
It is also expected that, following the devolution process, governments in beneficiary countries will be better informed of the results of the projects.
The internal control standards are being implemented simultaneously by the Delegations and by headquarters,in parallel with the devolution process, which will not be complete until the end of 2004.
However, due to special circumstances, the devolution process still remains in a very early stage so that the Court could carry out a limited review only.
The reform was implemented in conjunction with Commission-wide reforms(such as the introduction of a new Financial Regulation, and the abolition of technical assistance offices)which also had an impact on the devolution process.
Regarding the CommissionŐs management of the devolution process, it can be considered reasonably successful, at least as far as the delegations themselves are concerned.
The toolbox of planning and monitoring instruments that has been applied allowed due account to be given to particular situations(e.g. regional delegations, size/complexity of portfolio, easiness/difficulty of recruiting staff, etc.) and proved to be effective andappropriate for the management of the devolution process.
Under the devolution process, Commission Delegations now play the leading role in relations with NSAs and manage about 80%(by number) of the programmes and projects concerned.
Also, the lack of a complete set of performance indicators at an early stage in the devolution process makes it difficult to measure progress against the main objectives.
The devolution process involves all geographical areas covered by the CommissionŐs external aid programme, whether financed through the CommissionŐs budget or through the European Development Funds.
The report made a positive assessment of the Commission's management of the devolution process but concluded that in 2004 it was still too early to assess whether the intended results of devolution had been achieved.