Examples of using Evolutionists in English and their translations into Hebrew
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
Confessions of Evolutionists.
Evolutionists of the world, come out of your holes.
In other words, what kind of explanation could evolutionists offer?
Evolutionists have never found a mechanism that could.
Despite all the developments in science, this problem remains unsolved for evolutionists.
What, then, do the evolutionists propose as the basis for this story?
However, despite all the scientific advances that have been made,this problem still remains insoluble for evolutionists.
The fact is that evolutionists believe in evolution because they want to.
The concept of social progress was introduced in the early 19th century social theories,especially those of social evolutionists like Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer.
Evolutionists believe this to be a great piece of evidence for their theory.
This experiment is the only"evidence" evolutionists have with which to allegedly prove the"chemical evolution thesis";
Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolution as"homo," that is"man.".
As this verse makes clear, the dogmatic thinking of the evolutionists is not an original way of thinking, nor is it even peculiar to them.
For evolutionists, this clearly indicates that these organisms shared a common ancestor.
In short, Homo habilis,which is presented as a separate species by some evolutionists, is actually a species of ape, like all other Australopithecines.
Evolutionists refer to these imaginary creatures, which they believe to have lived in the past, as“transitional forms”.
In short, Homo habilis,which was presented as a different species by some evolutionists, was in reality an ape species just like all the other Australopithecines.
Evolutionists cannot point to any transitional fossils- creatures that are half reptile and half bird, for instance.
The concept of social progress was introduced in the early, 19th century social theories,especially those of social evolutionists like August Comte and Herbert Spencer.
For a long time, evolutionists struggled to prove that Lucy could walk upright;
Evolutionists claim that one day, a species dwelling in water somehow stepped onto land and was transformed into a land-dwelling species.
Simply put, the scenario of vestigial organs put forward by evolutionists contains a number of serious logical flaws, and has in any case been proven to be scientifically untrue.
Evolutionists want to explain away this achievement with the concept of"instinct" and try to present it as a simple attribute of the bee.
It is obvious that evolutionists have reached no common agreement on these family trees.
Evolutionists assume that the sea invertebrates that appear in the Cambrian stratum somehow evolved into fish in tens of million years.
Sure, every generation of evolutionists have a few new ones, but none of them have stood the test of time so far.
Evolutionists are quite sincere in their beliefs, but ultimately these beliefs are based on their view that the world originated by itself through totally naturalistic processes.
When we look at the few incidents the evolutionists have put forth as observed examples of natural selection, we see that these are nothing but a simple attempt to hoodwink.
However, the evolutionists were extremely disappointed when it was revealed that this tooth belonged neither to an ape-like creature nor to a man, but rather to an extinct pig species.
This means that evolutionists can package their lies so as to be easily persuasive.