Examples of using Evolutionists in English and their translations into Vietnamese
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Another example is the debate between evolutionists and creationists.
They(evolutionists) challenge science to prove the existence of God.
One of the most controversial issues of the day is the debate between evolutionists and creationists.
Some evolutionists have claimed that morality is what the majority decides it to be.
If evolution is true, then why did evolutionists have to invent Piltdown Man?
Evolutionists are always looking for evidence to support their faith in evolution.
The notion that the church in the Middle Ages believed that theearth was flat is a lie from evolutionists.
Consider those evolutionists who are very concerned about children being taught creation.
The majority of its followers are Christian scientists who call themselves theistic evolutionists or Christian evolutionists.
When evolutionists attempt to be moral, they are“borrowing” from the Christian worldview.
The Evolutionary Worldview Borrows from the Christian Worldview When evolutionists attempt to be moral, they are“borrowing” from the Christian worldview.
Evolutionists often raise this issue as an objection to the concept of a creator God.
But even at that time there were some evolutionists who were beginning to express doubts concerning this formulation of evolution theory.
Evolutionists believe the coal deposits in the Colorado Plateau to be hundreds of millions of years old.
Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is SHEER NONSENSE, not founded on observation, and wholly unsupported by the facts.
Evolutionists might say that standards of right and wrong can be created apart from God.
I expected him to do as other Christian evolutionists have done- to try to find ways to torture the text to escape these obvious implications.
Some evolutionists will object,“But you can't take current processes and extrapolate back like that.”.
Macro evolution… is a hypothetical process of unlimited variation that evolutionists believe transforms one kind of living organism into a fundamentally different kind such as the transformation of reptiles into birds or apes into people.
The evolutionists tenaciously hold to their theory on the basis of faith and as an axiom of their worldview.
Before living coelacanths were caught, evolutionists incorrectly believed the coelacanth had lungs, a large brain, and four bottom fins about to evolve into legs.
Evolutionists have tried hard to‘link' the various language families so that they in turn point back to a common ancestor.
We must, therefore, conclude that evolutionists are being inconsistent(irrational) when they talk about right and wrong, since such concepts are meaningless within their professed worldview.
Evolutionists are still trying to apply Darwin's 19th century thinking to a 21st century reality, and it's not working.
Thus, when evolutionists talk about morality as if it is a real standard, they are being inconsistent with their own worldview.
Thus, when evolutionists talk about morality as if it is a real standard that other people should follow, they are being inconsistent with their own worldview.
Evolutionists frequently reason about the properties of species“as if” they are maximizing their fitness, without worrying about the proximate mechanisms.
Evolutionists reasoned that the coelacanth, or a similar fish, must have crawled out of a shallow sea and filled its lungs with air, becoming the first four-legged land animal.
In other words, evolutionists assume that non-living chemicals gave rise to that first living cell which, in turn, evolved into ever and ever more complex forms of life.