Examples of using Return decision in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Article 6 of the same directive, headed‘Return decision' provides.
Where a return decision has already been issued, it shall be withdrawn.
Those States must continue their efforts to enforce the return decision.
A return decision must be issued to any third-country national staying illegally.
An entry ban cannot be issued independently butcan only accompany a return decision.
As in Greece, a return decision is also issued only if a person happens to be apprehended.
According to Eurostat,of the approximately 425 000 persons issued with a return decision in 2013, only around 167 000 left the EU.
Delays after a return decision have a negative impact on parent-child relationships and the best interests of children.
Likewise, it does not followthat a successful application for family reunification will automatically render invalid or otherwise cancel an earlier return decision.
A return decision results from the fact that the initial stay is unlawful whereas an entry ban applies to any subsequent stay making it unlawful.
In such circumstances, the Member State concerned must withdraw or, at the least,suspend the return decision and the entry ban to which that third-country national is subject.
The return decision shall provide for an appropriate period for voluntary departure of up to four weeks, unless there are reasons to believe that the person concerned might abscond during such a period.
Addressing situations where a third-countrynational who is the subject of a removal order or return decision issued by a Member State is apprehended in the territory of another Member State.
Return decision' means an administrative or judicial decision or act, stating or declaring the stay of a third-country national to be illegal and imposing an obligation to return; .
As a general principle, a harmonised two-step procedure should be applied,involving a return decision as a first step and, where necessary, the issuing of a removal order as a second step.
Where Member States are subject to obligations derived from fundamental rights as resulting, in particular, from the European Convention on Human Rights, such as the right to non-refoulment,the right to education and the right to family unity, no return decision shall be issued.
Article 6(6) allows Member States to adopt a return decision and an entry ban at the same time, but it is clear from the directive's general scheme that those two decisions are separate.
However, in order to avoid possible procedural delays,Member States should be allowed to issue both a return decision and a removal order within a single act or decision. .
In what follows I proceed from the assumption that the return decision and accompanying entry ban have been duly notified to the third-country national and have become definitive under national law.
It follows from recital 6 of that directive that the Member States are obliged to adopt,with respect to illegally staying third-country nationals in their territory, a return decision, prescribed by Article 6(1) of that directive, after a fair and transparent procedure.
Establishing- as a general principle- a harmonised two-step procedure:involving a return decision as a first step and- if necessary- the issuing of a removal order as a second step, thus aligning to a certain extent the currently divergent Member States systems.
(26)‘return decision' means an administrative or judicial decision or act, stating or declaring the stay of a third-country national to be irregular and imposing or stating an obligation to return in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC as defined in point 4 of Article 3 of Directive 2008/115/EC;
Provision should be made to deal with the situation of a third-countrynational who is the subject of a removal order or return decision issued by a Member State and is apprehended in the territory of another Member State.
Recognise the return decision or removal order issued by the first Member State and carry out the removal, in which case Member States shall compensate each other for any financial imbalance which may caused, applying Council Decision 2004/191/EC mutatis mutandis;
Furthermore, both those arrangements fail to recognise that entry bans are not standalone measures butalways accompany a return decision, as is apparent from the wording of Articles 3(6) and 11(1) of the Return Directive.
If the recipient of an annulled visa isalready present on the territory of a Member State, no return decision may be taken until the appeal period is exhausted or the final decision on the appeal has been duly notified to the recipient.'.
If, once it is established that a third-country national is staying illegally on the territory of a Member State,that Member State were not to adopt a return decision but were to cause the person instead to be imprisoned, it would effectively suspend its obligations under the directive.
Make an exception to the right to remain in the territory,provided the determining authority is satisfied that a return decision will not lead to direct or indirect refoulement in violation of international and Union obligations of that Member State.
The distribution key would consist of two components: one relating to the number ofthird country nationals who are subject to a return decision obliging them and/or informing them of the obligation to leave the territory of the Member State and one relating to successful past returns. .