Examples of using Second plea in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
The second plea should be examined first.
The second part of the second plea 2.
Second plea, alleging breach of the rights of the defence.
In my view, this second plea comprises two limbs.
I am therefore of the view that the first part of the second plea must fail.
People also translate
The Czech Republic's second plea is divided into two parts.
B- Rebuttal of the presumption of the exercise of decisive influence(second plea).
Therefore, the first branch of the second plea is well founded.
B- The second plea, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment as between tenderers.
Consequently, the second part of the second plea is ineffective.
The second plea in the main appeals and the second and third pleas in the crossappeals.
The second part of the second plea must therefore be upheld.
Accordingly, in paragraph 55 of that judgment,the General Court upheld the second plea in part.
Consequently, the second plea must be rejected as unfounded.
It follows from all of the foregoing considerations that the second plea must be rejected as unfounded.
The second part of the second plea is based on Article 44(2) of Directive 2004/18.
Accordingly, the third part of the second plea must be rejected.
This part of the second plea and, accordingly, the second plea in its entirety must therefore be rejected.
The second and third parts of the second plea are therefore well founded.
Second plea: the General Court wrongly concluded that the U.S. decisions cannot serve as a basis for the initial listing;
The Court of First Instance, when rejecting the second plea in law, did not take into account that OHIM misused their power.
My second plea is for you to ensure that we will finally have a road map and that we will have transparency on what kinds of items are debated in the TEC.
In consequence, the Court should consider the appellant's second plea well founded and set aside the judgment under appeal.
Finally, in the third part of its second plea the Commission raises, in the alternative, an allegation of infringement of the general transparency rule, as contained in Article 2 of Directive 2004/18.
The General Court limited its assessment to the first plea and the first three parts of the second plea, rejecting the first plea and the first two parts of the second plea.
The first part of the second plea specifically concerns the requirements relating to evidence of tenderers' technical ability.
It follows that, irrespective even of its inadmissibility, the second plea, which is based on a false premise, clearly lacks any foundation in law.
Second Plea: The appellant did not exercise decisive influence in the sense required by the case law between 3 May 2007 to 28 January 2009(“the post-IPO period”).
The Court of First Instance, when rejecting the second plea in law, infringed Article 79 CTMR by not taking into account that the opponent acted in bad faith;
The second part of the second plea, relating to the failure to make available to all prospective tenderers various relevant technical information from the beginning of the tendering procedure.