Examples of using Leniency programmes in English and their translations into Italian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
Interaction between leniency programmes and actions for damages.
Leniency programmes have an enormous impact on the number of detected cartels
Clarify the relationships among the leniency programmes of the EU and the national enforcement agencies;
Leniency programmes are generally recognised as an important tool to detect secret cartels.
The proposal is based on the notion that those requesting leniency programmes should be heavily protected against actions for damages.
Leniency programmes which have proved their worth in the fight against cartels
too much protection to undertakings benefiting from leniency programmes, to the detriment of the victims.
The EESC supports also leniency programmes which make it possible to identify numerous infringements.
and 17 have fully or partially convergent leniency programmes.
By the end of 2008, 25 Member States had leniency programmes and the remaining two(Malta and Slovenia) are expected to introduce them in the near future.
including the introduction and chapters on searches/inspections(with best practices) and on leniency programmes(to which further chapters will be added later);
Both leniency programmes and civil liability contribute by their effects to the same aim:
significant development for cartel enforcement in the Community as leniency programmes are the cornerstone of efficient cartel detection.
The Community acquis and the effectiveness of leniency programmes must be maintained,
decision of potential applicants to seek the benefit of leniency programmes as they can now be protected almost everywhere in the EU.
A further measure to ensure that leniency programmes continue to be fully attractive could
given to the impact of damages claims on the operation of leniency programmes so as to preserve the effectiveness of the programmes. .
and Article 12 of Regulation 1/2003 and the operation of leniency programmes.
Like the Commission, the Committee thinks that the leniency programmes help to detect many infringements,
action because they are based on the notion that those requesting leniency programmes should be heavily protected against actions for damages.
Like the Commission, the Committee supports the leniency programmes, which assist the detection of many infringements,
interplay between leniency programmes and criminal prosecution;
The importance of leniency programmes and the need to avoid that leniency applicants find
along with the connection with leniency programmes, and even how to overcome the differences between the systems
Like the Commission, it supports leniency programmes which make it possible to identify numerous infringements
and interaction between leniency programmes and actions for damages.
For instance, in order to safeguard the attractiveness of leniency programmes, it provides that corporate leniency statements should
to exempt them from sanctions when they are involved in the infringement leniency programmes.
not give enough emphasis, however, to a number of underlying problems: existing leniency programmes in the EU vary widely, both in terms of the basic requirements for receiving leniency and in terms of their procedures; furthermore, not all national competition authorities have set up leniency programmes; only 18 authorities(including the Commission) have done so.