Examples of using Fair return in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
Fair return and private sector.
Member States make different assessments about the impact of the“fair return” principle.
Fair return and private sector.
So this issue is still looked at very much from a national perspective:'my fair return.
In the system of"fair return" each country gets back its own investment via subscription and concession.
In recognition of continued commitment, shareholders receive a fair return on investment.
In ESA's industrial policy2 of"fair return" each country gets back its own investment via subscription and concession.
Protecting the sustainability of resources requires other measures,such as guaranteeing a fair return within the sector.
Design protection should allow obtaining a fair return on the investment made and fostering innovation through competition, which is achieved in the production of new products.
An adjustment to more European commercial thinking, is needed in addition to traditional principles and practices as fair return which were also open to certain national reflexes.
However, the aid may also cover a fair return on capital if Member States can show that this is indispensable given the poor competitiveness of certain renewable energy sources.
Reducing financial leverage,increasing risk-protection opportunities and settling for fair returns is the right way to move forward: a return to the future.
ESA programmes are governed by the industrial policy principles established in the ESA Convention,in particular by exploiting competitive bidding while distributing industrial contracts in proportion to funding from Member States“fair return”.
At the same time the Council recognises ESA's industrial policy,in particular its"fair return" principle, as an instrument to motivate investment and enhance European competitiveness.
The first principle concerns“a fair return”, i.e. each Member State expects its own contribution to be in proportion to the benefits accruing to it: such benefits are not all quantifiable since they derive directly from that country's accession to the EU.
Welcomes the moves to improve andsimplify the structure of the EU budget, so as to substantially deflate the issues of fair return and horizontal fairness between the Member States;
A balanced policy should take into account a variety of needs: fair return on investment to incentivise R& D and innovation, a sustainable standardisation process, wide availability of technologies in an open and competitive market, and the difficulty for SMEs to participate.
In order to ensure food security, it is essential to increase transparency and fairness in the actual food chain, so thatwe can secure a fair return for farmers, with profits and price controls, and a viable agricultural sector.
The"fair return" rule, which has enabled European business to compete, must be limited to ESA activities, on the understanding that in the case of Community funds, systems will have to be devised for assigning orders while abiding by single market principles.
Therefore the EESC advocates an open and transparent analysis anddialogue of what is needed for the forthcoming decade as concerns the"fair return" principle and the need for adequate and timely industrial missions.
In this case, the negotiators would not only have to find a compromise between fair return and solidarity mentioned under point 1.4 but also to show particular political sensitivity by taking into account public opinion in Europe, and especially public opinion in the new Member States.
In particular, the duration of the authorisation granted must be fixed in such as way that itdoes not restrict or limit free competition beyond what is necessary to enable the provider to recoup the cost of investment and to make a fair return on the capital invested.
As regards cooperative programmes,the still frequent use of the principle of fair return on investment(“juste retour”) generally limits any opening-up to the participating countries and implies a distribution of work based on purely national industrial policy criteria.
Consequently, so as to be able to finance the actions linked to the EU's new competences under the Treaty of Lisbon, I am supporting the request for the question of own resources to be examined and for new forms of Community income, in order to ease the pressure on national budgets andto do away with the belief in a'fair return' which is economically inaccurate and politically unsound.
Against this background, a fast, predictable, efficient and globally acceptable licensing approach,which ensures a fair return on investment for standard essential patent(SEPs) holders and fair access to SEPs for all players- and especially SMEs- of the value chain would be beneficial.
There are strong reasons to keep the Commission involved in the management of research programmes, including its unique experience and overall knowledge of the European research scene,the very useful feedback it provides for EU research policy-making as well as the trust Member States have in this formula which ensures absence of fair return considerations.
Strategic concepts and programmes in Member States, specific national relationships with private companies,intergovernmental cooperation in and beyond the EU, and technology-driven ESA as an intergovernmental Agency explain the principle"fair return": each country gets back its own investment in ESA-activities under the form of contracts to its industry via a complicated pattern of subscription and concession.
The fairs return to the roots and will take place at the Palace of Culture and Science.
Technological development generates other forms of production, making it necessary to develop new economic andtrade models which must guarantee fairer returns for all categories of rights-holders.