Examples of using Detection and prosecution in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
The detection and prosecution of infringements;
(a) the prevention,investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences;
They include, for example, a strict limitation on the purpose of processing,which is limited to the investigation, detection and prosecution of terrorism.
The prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences;
Detection and prosecution of all perpetrators of attacks on journalistsand media assets is essential"to prove that the government cares for press freedom," the organisation noted.
Ensuring that certain data are available for the purposes of investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crime?
The prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of breaches of ethics for regulated professions;
(5) Several Member States have adopted legislation providing for the retention of data by service providers for the prevention,investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offences.
The prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of breaches of ethics for regulated professions;
Recitals 5 to 11 in the preamble to Directive 2006/24 provide as follows:‘(5) Several Member States have adopted legislation providing for the retention of data by service providers for the prevention,investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences.
(d) the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, or of breaches of ethics for regulated professions;
Personal data collected exclusively for ensuring the security or the control of the processing systems or operations shall not be used for any other purpose, with the exception of the prevention,investigation, detection and prosecution of serious criminal offences.
In prevention, detection and prosecution, law enforcement has to be able to match and anticipate the ingenuity of the criminals.
It therefore seeks to ensure that the data are available for the purpose of the prevention,investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crime, such as, in particular, organised crime and terrorism.
Public policy, in particular the prevention,investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, including the protection of minorsand the fight against any incitement to hatred on grounds of race, sex, religion or nationality, and violations of human dignity concerning individual persons.
Under the Framework Decision, Member States must ensure that their competent authorities inform data subjects that their data are being processed or transmitted to another Member State for the purpose of prevention,investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties.
Ireland takes the view that the directive cannot be based onArticle 95 EC since its‘centre of gravity' does not concern the functioning of the internal market but rather the investigation, detection and prosecution of crime, and that measures of this kind ought therefore to have been adopted on the basis of the articles of the EU Treaty relating to police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
The Data Retention Directive(Directive 2006/24/EC) requires Member States to ensure that these operators retain certain categories of data(for identifying identity and details of phone calls made and emails sent, excluding the content of those communications)for the purpose of the investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crime, as defined by national law.
Such a restriction must be necessary, appropriate and proportionate within a democratic society to safeguard national security(that is, State security), defence, public security, and the prevention,investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences or of unauthorised use of the electronic communication system, as referred to in Article 13(1) of Directive 95/46/EC.
LANDTAG SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN v COMMISSION unlimited access to internal document SEC(2005) 420 of 22 March 2005, containing a legal analysis of a draft framework decision, under discussion in the Council, on the retention of data processed and stored in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of data on public communications networks for the purpose of prevention,investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences including terrorism.
(26) Member States, in conformity with conditions established in this Directive, may apply their national rules on criminal law and criminal proceedings with a view to taking all investigative and other measures necessary for the detection and prosecution of criminal offences, without there being a need to notify such measures to the Commission.
(87) These derogations should in particular apply to data transfers required and necessary for the protection of important grounds of public interest, for example in cases of international data transfers between competition authorities, tax or customs administrations, financial supervisory authorities, between services competent for social security matters, orto competent authorities for the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences.
(7) The provisions of this Directive and the Specific Directives are without prejudice to the possibility for each Member State to take the necessary measures to ensure the protection of its essential security interests, to safeguard public policy and public security, and to permit the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, including the establishment by national regulatory authorities of specificand proportional obligations applicable to providers of electronic communications services.
(5) The provisions of this Directive and the Specific Directives are without prejudice to the possibility for each Member State to take the necessary measures ð justified on grounds set out in Articles 87 and 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, ï to ensure the protection of its essential security interests, to safeguard public policyð, public moralityï and public security, and to permit the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences.
Any such restrictions must be necessary, appropriate and proportionate within a democratic society for specific public order purposes, i.e. to safeguard national security(i.e. State security), defence, public security or the prevention,investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences or of unauthorised use of the electronic communications systems.
This Directive aims to harmonise Member States' provisions concerning the obligations of the providers of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks with respect to the retention of certain data which are generated or processed by them, in order toensure that the data are available for the purpose of the investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crime, as defined by each Member State in its national law.'.
By its first question in Case C‑293/12, the High Court asks the Court whether, in the light of Article 5(4) TEU, Directive 2006/24 is proportionate to the objectives which it pursues,be it the objective of ensuring that the data retained are available for the purpose of the detection and prosecution of serious crime or that of ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market or both of them.
The primary objective of Directive 2006/24 is to harmonise national rules which already impose on providers of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks(31) obligations to retain the traffic and location data which it determines, in order toensure their availability‘for the purpose of the investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crime, as defined by each Member State in its national law'.
For the purpose of verifying the applicability ratione materiæ of Directive 2006/24 to the present case, it must be noted that, according to Article 1 of that directive,it seeks to ensure‘that the data are available for the purpose of the investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crime, as defined by each Member State in its national law'.
Member States may adopt legislative measures to restrict the scope of the rights and obligations provided for in Article 5, Article 6, Article 8(1),(2),(3) and(4), and Article 9 of this Directive when such restriction constitutes a necessary, appropriate and proportionate measure within a democratic society to safeguard national security(i.e. State security), defence, public security, and the prevention,investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences or of unauthorised use of the electronic communication system, as referred to in Article 13(1) of Directive 95/46/EC.