Examples of using Normal exploitation in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
The limitations shall only be applied in certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the subject-matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder.".
The owner of a protected industrial design shall have the right to prevent third parties not having the owner's consent from making, offering, selling, importing, stocking or using articles bearing, or embodying the protected design when such acts areundertaken for commercial purposes, or unduly prejudice the normal exploitation of the design or are not compatible with fair trade practice.
They can be applied only in certain special cases which do not conflict with the normal exploitation of the works or other subject-matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholders.
(c) acts of reproduction for the purpose of making citations or of teaching, provided that such acts are compatible with fair trade practice anddo not unduly prejudice the normal exploitation of the design, and that mention is made of the source.
The Court referred to‘pirated works' which adversely affect the normal exploitation of copyright-protected works, in accordance with Directive 2001/29, in the judgment of 10 April 2014, ACI Adam and Others(C‑435/12, EU: C: 2014:254, paragraph 39).
(c) acts of reproduction for the purposesof making citations or of teaching, provided that such acts are compatible with fair trade practice and do not unduly prejudice the normal exploitation of the design, and that mention is made of the source.
The EC Party and the Signatory CARIFORUM States may provide limited exceptions to the protection of industrial designs,provided that such exceptions do not unreasonably conflict with the normal exploitation of protected industrial designs and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the owner of the protected design, taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties.
In that regard, it is sufficient to state that the limitation provided for in Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29 is accompanied by a number of restrictions that guarantee- even thoughthe application of that provision is ruled out only in the event that contractual terms have actually been concluded- the continuing applicability of such a limitation in special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the works and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder.
The limitations referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be applied only in certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the subject matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder.
(2) It shall be a matter for legislation in the countries of the Union to permit the reproduction of such works in certain special cases,provided that such reproduction does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author.
A lawful user of a database which is made available to the public in whatever manner may not perform acts which conflict with normal exploitation of the database or unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the maker of the database.
In short, I believe that the streaming of protected digital content without the permission of the copyright holders does not satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 5(5) of Directive 2001/29, for it does not constitute a special case,it conflicts with the normal exploitation of the work, and it unreasonably prejudices the legitimate interests of the right holders.
According to Article 5(5), these exceptions and limitations‘… shall only be applied in certain specific cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work or other subject-matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder'.
Furthermore, through the application of the"three-step test" drawn up by the WTO and the WIPO, such limitations are subject to three conditions: they may apply only tocertain special cases(e.g. visually impaired users), they may not be in conflict with the normal exploitation of the work and they may not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the right holder.
In any event, according to Article 10(3), these limitations‘… shall be applied only in certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the subject-matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder'.
The exceptions and limitations provided for in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and4 shall only be applied in certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work or other subject-matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder.
Article 5(5) specifies that the exceptions and limitations provided‘shall only be applied in certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work or other subject matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder'.
Enshrined in the main international treaties on copyright,provides that exceptions shall only be applied in certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of a work or other subject matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the right holder.
The repeated andsystematic extraction and/or re-utilization of insubstantial parts of the contents of the database implying acts which conflict with a normal exploitation of that database or which unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the maker of the database shall not be permitted.
That provision states that the exception provided for in,inter alia, paragraph 1, regarding temporary acts of reproduction,‘shall only be applied in certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work or other subject matter and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the rightholder'.
(11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purpose of export outside the Union and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself,the exception introduced by this Regulation will not unreasonably conflict with normal exploitation of the product in the Member State where the certificate is in force, nor unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the certificate-holder, taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties.
(11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purpose of export to third countries and of placing into the Union market as from day 1 afterthe certificate has expired, the exception introduced by this Regulation should not unreasonably conflict with normal exploitation of the product in the Member State where the certificate is in force, nor prejudice the legitimate interests of the certificate-holder, whilst also taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties.
Amendment(11) By limiting the scope of the exception to making for the purpose of export outside the Union and acts strictly necessary for such making or for the actual export itself,the exception introduced by this Regulation will not unreasonably conflict with normal exploitation of the product in the Member State where the certificate is in force, nor unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the certificate-holder, taking account of the legitimate interests of third parties.