Examples of using Code of judicial conduct in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Iowa Code of Judicial Conduct.
Following its earlier meeting in Vienna in April 2000 this group met in Bangalore, India,in February 2001 where it endorsed a draft code of judicial conduct.
The Idaho Code of Judicial Conduct 1976.
Application and enforcement of the code of judicial conduct 29.
A code of judicial conduct has several objectives.
Another measure is the adoption of, andcompliance with, a national code of judicial conduct that reflects contemporary international standards.
The Code of Judicial Conduct of the Philippines, September 1989.
Morocco highlighted certain initiatives, such as the creation of the media commission,the strategic plan of the judiciary and the code of judicial conduct.
A code of judicial conduct may be supplemented with a code of conduct for court personnel.
Following its meeting in Vienna in April 2000 this group met in Bangalore, India,in February 2001 where it endorsed a draft code of judicial conduct widely referred to as the Draft Bangalore Code. .
The Code of Judicial Conduct adopted by the Supreme Court of the State of Washington, USA, October 1995.
The Supreme Judicial Council had established a committee to develop a manual that would provide judges with more detailed guidance on gender issues than that contained in the Code of Judicial Conduct.
The Code of Judicial Conduct adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association, August 1972.
The Group recognized, however, that since the Bangalore Draft had been developed by judges drawn principally from common law countries, it was essential that it be scrutinized by judges of other legal traditions so thatit could assume the status of a duly authenticated international code of judicial conduct.
There is no code of judicial conduct as such, but the Organization Act governing the judiciary contains strict rules of ethics and professional practice.
The Judicial Group recognized, however, that since the Bangalore Draft had been developed by judges drawn principally from common law countries,it was essential that it be scrutinized by judges of other legal traditions to enable it to assume the status of a duly authenticated international code of judicial conduct.
The adoption of a code of judicial conduct is a crucial aspect of any effective approach to supporting judiciary integrity.
At the regional level, work was continuing on criminal justice and crime prevention, including proposals for the establishment of a Caribbean court of justice, a regional justice-protection programme, a harmonized approach to the death penalty, the development of legal education andthe practice of law, a code of judicial conduct and harmonization of laws.
A code of judicial conduct will do little to improve judicial performance and enhance public confidence if it is not enforceable.
The launching of the Strategic Plan coincided with that of the first Seychelles Code of Judicial Conduct which is the voluntary product of consultation among the justices of appeal, judges, master and magistrates of the Seychelles Judiciary.
The Code of Judicial Conduct, in line with the Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary and the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct, had been adopted in 2009.
In May 2010,the Strategic Plan 2010-2014 of the Judiciary was launched to make the judiciary a centre of judicial excellence, as was the first Code of Judicial Conduct, which encapsulated six core principles: independence; impartiality; integrity; propriety; competence and diligence of the judges; and equality of all before the law and the courts.
In preparing a draft code of judicial conduct in accordance with the directions set out above, reference was made to several existing codes and international instruments including, in particular, the following.
Given that there was a code of judicial conduct and that there had been judicial reform decrees, it would be useful to know to what extent those instruments were applied.
An American Bar Association Code of Judicial Conduct has been adopted by a majority of the jurisdictions in the United States, and is of hortatory if not mandatory force in others.
In preparing a draft code of judicial conduct in accordance with the directions set out above, reference was made to several existing codes and international instruments including, in particular, the following.
The code has been developed with reference to provisions that occur in existing codes of judicial conduct, primarily those from the common law legal tradition.
The courses dealt with a range of subjectsincluding international humanitarian law, human rights, codes of judicial conduct and the treatment of detainees.
Instead, efforts have been made in many States to involve bodies outside of the judiciary in the application and enforcement of codes of judicial conduct.
It also benefited from the contents of more recent codes of judicial conduct, including the Guide to Judicial Conduct published by the Council of Chief Justices of Australia in June 2002, the Model Rules of Conduct for Judges of the Baltic States, the Code of Judicial Ethics for Judges of the People's Republic of China and the Code of Judicial Ethicsof the Macedonian Judges Association.