Examples of using Comparison group in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The comparison group received conventional therapy.
Times faster than in the parous from the comparison group.
The comparison group consisted of 10 boys with cicatricial phimosis.
Compared to 17.5% in the nonsmoking patients from a comparison group.
A comparison group consisted of 58 patients 24 females and 34 males.
Relapse of urolithiasis: against androgenic therapy- 28,6%, in comparison group- 63,2.
Comparison group consisted of 20 healthy children without asphyxia.
Dummy coding is used when there is a control or comparison group in mind.
The comparison group has received these drugs as monotherapy.
The treatment group patients required less time for SMV search and isolation than those of the comparison group- 16.8±0.7 versus 21.2±1.7 min; the difference being significant, p=0.029.
In the comparison group, 25 children were subjected exclusively to the standard therapy.
The study included 1903 subjects divided as follows:the main group, the comparison group(other types of oncological diseases, n=1033), and the control group generally healthy, n=425.
The comparison group included 15 healthy volunteers comparable in age and sex.
The first group consisted of patients with chronic generalized periodontitis,who had no syringomyelia(comparison group), and the second group consisted of patients with chronic generalized periodontitis, who had syringomyelia the main group. .
The comparison group consisted of 15 healthy volunteers comparable in age and sex.
However, the greater difficulty of defining a comparison group means that quasi-experimental designs are more commonly used at the programme level.
Comparison group has not received neuroprotective agents in perioperative period.
Isolated PDA dehiscence(6 cases) in the comparison group was revealed after end-to-end IPJA, 2 of them were performed according to the original technique.
The comparison group(II) comprised 20 women who received only suppositories with estriol.
One of the causes of 2 DP in the comparison group was mistaken end-to-end IPJA, when the diameters of the jejunum and the pancreatic stump were equal.
A comparison group comprised 20 infants without asphyxia at birth, which were being examined and treated at the in-patient department because of other problems.
When searching andisolating SMV, in the comparison group there were 5 cases with diffuse bleeding in the cellular tissue in the area of operation, which impeded the surgeon's manipulations.
In the comparison group there were 6 cases of acute pancreatitis and 3 fatal cases.
A prospective cohort non-randomized study without a comparison group using formalized checklists to monitor the quality of the implementation of the regulation for medical care for patients with ACVDs in the Sverdlovsk Region.
The comparison group consisted of 14 patients in whom SMV search and isolation was performed directly at the inferior border of the pancreas.
In addition, the comparison group included 32 patients with exacerbation of duodenal ulcer disease associated with H.
The comparison group consisted of 20 patients with calculi of the kidney without symptoms of obstruction.
In the comparison group in three cases the separation of the lateral SMV tributaries during its isolation occured.
The comparison group consisted of 30 children with AR without colonization of the nasal cavity with fungal microflora.
In the comparison group the patients received standard therapy according to the federal clinical guidelines.