Examples of using Concerning draft article in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Concerning draft article 7.
He would, therefore, submit proposals concerning draft article 15.
Concerning draft article 20, it was agreed that the word"or" in paragraph 1 should be replaced by the word"and.
There was general agreement on a number of points concerning draft article 5 as set out below.
Concerning draft article 1, on scope of the present Convention, some members supported the current reformulation.
Switzerland supported the Coordinator's proposal concerning draft article 18, provided that it was considered as a package.
Concerning draft article 8, he believed the issue of refugees and stateless persons had not been recognized in customary international law.
Mr. Mollmann(Observer for Denmark),referring to paragraph 9 concerning draft article 49, proposed inserting the phrase"into the transport document" after the word"incorporated" in the second sentence; otherwise it did not make sense.
Concerning draft article 4, his delegation welcomed the clarification in the commentary on the sustainability of recharging aquifers.
Ms. Downing(Australia), referring to paragraph 13 concerning draft article 69, suggested inserting a sentence at the end of the paragraph to reflect a previous statement by her delegation about jurisdiction clauses in volume contracts.
Concerning draft article 14 on prevention, reduction and control of pollution, the Special Rapporteur's approach was a wise one.
Mr. Sato(Japan), referring to paragraph 25 concerning draft article 77, proposed inserting the words"or'claimant'" after the phrase"the term'plaintiff'" in the last sentence, so as to indicate clearly that neither"plaintiff" nor"claimant" were appropriate terms in that context.
Concerning draft article 8, on general obligation to cooperate, support was expressed for the emphasis on the general obligation to cooperate.
Concerning draft article 2, it was noted that its contents should not become definitive until the completion of the study by the Commission.
Concerning draft article 11, Israel supported the principle that external assistance could be provided only with the consent of the affected State.
Concerning draft article 1(Scope), his delegation endorsed the rights-based approach which placed the individual at the centre of relief efforts.
Concerning draft article 2, the phrase"… and their hydraulic connection with surface water" should be added at the end of the definition of"aquifer system.
Concerning draft article 21, her delegation had similar questions as to how distress would apply to an international organization, if at all.
Concerning draft article 7, his delegation agreed that the object and purpose of some treaties negated the possibility of suspension or termination in the event of armed conflict.
Concerning draft article 5, her delegation considered that the test of effective control in relation to the question of attribution must reflect the development of recent jurisprudence on that issue.
Concerning draft article 7,"Continued operation of treaties resulting from their subject matter", she questioned the relevance of the annex listing categories of treaties, even for indicative purposes.
Concerning draft article 8(Primary responsibility of the affected State), his delegation supported the Commission's focus on the rights and obligations of affected States vis-à-vis external actors.
Concerning draft article 7, on human dignity, the Special Rapporteur recalled that the Commission had already had the opportunity to debate the concept in the context of its consideration of the topic of the expulsion of aliens.
Concerning draft article 2, he agreed that the definition of armed conflict should also cover the issue of internal armed conflicts in view of their deplorable frequency and intensity.
Concerning draft article 5, on equitable and reasonable utilization, several members expressed support for the principles therein, noting that they were important for aquifers in view of their fragile nature.
Concerning draft article 15, her delegation had a strong preference for the inclusion of a reference to resort to force in violation of article 2, paragraph 4, of the Charter of the United Nations, rather than a reference to aggression.
Concerning draft article 10(Duty of the affected State to seek assistance), many delegations welcomed establishing as legal, and not as moral or political, the duty of the affected State to seek assistance.
Concerning draft article 12, he agreed with comments made in the Commission that it was difficult to categorize States, intergovernmental organizations and relevant non-governmental organizations as subjects enjoying the"right to offer assistance.
Concerning draft article 8, her delegation was not convinced that it added anything to the principles that already applied to human rights: perhaps a reference to human rights in the preamble to the draft articles would suffice.
Concerning draft article 13(Conditions on the provision of external assistance), the Drafting Committee was to be commended for recognizing that an affected State could impose conditions on the provision of external assistance within its territory.