Examples of using Consequences for third in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
TRADE/INFORMAL/1999/13 EU Enlargement: Consequences for Third Countries, Project Proposed by Republic of Belarus.
Furthermore, efforts should be made to ensure that they did not have negative consequences for third States.
These arrangements have consequences for third parties that may also have rights in the encumbered assets, or a right to proceeds of their disposition.
In reality sanctions imposed on targeted States might cause negative consequences for third States.
Nevertheless, his delegation continued to believe that the adverse consequences for third States should be addressed on a case-by-case basis, rather than through the creation of new institutions or mechanisms.
The increasingly frequent use of sanctions measuress by the Security Council could have serious economic and social consequences for third States.
His delegation believed that the questions of the type of sanctions imposed,their effectiveness and their consequences for third States must remain on the agenda of the Special Committee and other United Nations forums.
There was no doubt that the Security Council's increasingly frequent use of sanctions was giving rise to serious economic and social consequences for third States.
That does not prevent the Court from considering the issue of consequences for third States once that act has been found to be illegal but then the Court's conclusion is wholly dependent upon its reasoning and not upon the necessary logic of the request.
Experience had shown that economic embargoes andtrade sanctions gave rise to undesirable consequences for third States and, in particular,for developing countries.
On many occasions sanctions failed to achieve the objectives which were sought, and led to hunger, poverty and economic destruction,not to mention the negative economic and social consequences for third States.
When sanctions were imposed, their"humanitarian limits" must be defined anda calculation made of the probable consequences for third countries and the civilian population, especially the most vulnerable groups.
All Member States must ensure the implementation of the measures adopted by the Security Council and,at the same time, take appropriate steps to alleviate their adverse consequences for third countries.
There was in fact growing concern within the international community about the consequences for third States of preventive or enforcement measures, which had led to the creation of an ad hoc expert group to study that issue A/Res/52/162, para. 4.
Sanctions should only be applied when all other means of peaceful settlement of disputes had been exhausted and their undesirable consequences for third States must be limited as far as possible.
The Security Council in imposing sanctions should, on the basis of a prior assessment of their possible adverse consequences for third States, and when it might be required by the nature and dimension of those consequences, establish an appropriate arrangement that would comprise competent international institutions, in order to provide those States with immediate as well as long-term assistance.
In addition, there is a need to analyse the present mechanism of sanctions to ensure that their imposition is balanced and well-grounded,in particular taking into account eventual negative consequences for third countries.
The regime of countermeasures contained in the draft is properly restrictive,although what is lacking is a specific provision on the consequences for third States of countermeasures taken against the responsible State.
The need to explore practical and innovative measures of assistance to the affected third States has been reduced considerably because targeted sanctions have led to significant reductions in unintended economic consequences for third States.
As indicated by the ad hoc expert group, the role that international financial and trade institutions could play was considered pivotal,both in assessing the adverse consequences for third States resulting from the imposition of sanctions and in providing assistance.
Mr. Sethi(India) said that his delegation was pleased to note that the Security Council had adopted various measures to mitigate the effects of sanctions and that,by carefully targeting the latter, it had been possible to achieve significant reductions in unintended economic consequences for third States.
It is difficult to define a standard framework for this, as the nature of sanctions and their likely impact,particularly the unintended economic consequences for third States, will vary from country to country.
In particular, it believed that consideration should not be confined to the consequences of such sanctions but that recommendations should be prepared on measures which the Security Council could adopt prior to the imposition of sanctions, with a view to preventing ormitigating their adverse economic consequences for third States.
The period of implementation of the sanctions has shown the lack of preparedness of the international community to respond in an adequate manner to difficulties andunforeseen negative consequences for third States neighbouring the target country.
Mr. Boon Pracong(Thailand) said that mandatory sanctions, which had a firm basis in the Charter of the United Nations, were a useful mechanism for preserving international peace and security,although to the extent possible they should be imposed with due care to avoid negative material and financial consequences for third States.
English Page The period of the implementation of sanctions has shown the lack of preparedness of the international community to respond in an adequate manner to difficulties andunforeseen negative consequences for third States neighbouring the target country.
In the view of Bulgaria, the period of implementation of the sanctions has shown the lack of preparedness of the international community to respond in an adequate manner to difficulties andunforeseen negative consequences for third States neighbouring the target country.
He was therefore pleased to note that the Security Council had adopted various measures to mitigate the effects of sanctions on third States and to ensure that sanctions were carefully targeted,with the result that the unintended economic consequences for third States had been significantly reduced.
Poland considers that the total costs of a given sanctions regime borne by a third State should be calculated after the sanctions have been lifted and should take into account, in particular, the assessed losses and damages of that State, the assistance received by it from different sources,as well as the assessed costs of long-lasting negative consequences of the sanctions e.g., such consequences for third States in the transport sector might come to light long after the sanctions have been lifted.
Sanctions should be imposed in such a way that they did not have excessively harmful consequences, especially for third States.