Examples of using Delay should in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
I mean, the delay should be imperceptible.
However, the EU has already said that the delay should be longer.
Otherwise, the reason for any delay should be given and a new date for a reply indicated.
The faster the servo is,the lower the Rudder delay should be.
Where applicable, the reasons for a delay should always be indicated when a report was introduced.
People also translate
Given the procedural rules which must be complied with by an authority when conducting procedures,undue delay should not occur in practice.
However, the EU has already said that the delay should be longer. Otherwise, there should be no delay at all.
The delay should also have led to a projected cost increase associated with, for example, additional staff time but this was not recognized in expenditure projections.
But for percussion the delay should be minimal.
Liability for delay should be mandatory on the part of both the shipper and the carrier; and.
The prevailing view was that a provision on delay should be included in the draft instrument.
Liability for delay should be mandatory on the part of the carrier, but more flexible with respect to shippers;
The repeated performing the operations after the delay should be performed faster than for a new user.
Liability for delay should be made non-mandatory, or subject to freedom of contract, in regard to both the carrier and the shipper;
References to the shipper's liability for delay should be deleted and the text adjusted accordingly;
If this development process has to be participatory, the decisions have to be taken with the full involvement of the beneficiaries,keeping in mind that if that involves a delay in the process, that delay should be minimized.
Otherwise, the reason for the delay should be given and a new date for a reaction proposed.
Subparagraph(b) of draft article 10 provided that local remedies did not need to be exhausted when there was"undue delay" in the remedial process, but the delay should be taken into account only when it was tantamount to a denial of justice.
Despite the difficulties on A5 well, the delay should not cost the company any more money due to turnkey nature of the drilling contract.
Some support was expressed for the view that the question of how to deal with delay should be left exclusively to the parties.
In our view the construction delay should have been foreseen given local procurement lead times and the impact of the rainy season.
More specific arguments were put forward in support of the view that liability for delay should be non-mandatory, as set out in A/CN.9/WG. III/WP.91.
But at the same time, decisions without delay should be the result of a process in which the human rights of the child and legal safeguards are fully respected.
The SPT emphasizes that the possibility to delay the notification should be applied in a restrictive manner; such a delay should always be proportionate and not longer than strictly necessary.
While this is a cause for concern, the delay should be seen in the context of the implementation timetable, which may have underestimated the delays involved in deploying the necessary personnel and equipment.
If the cargo is delayed on one railway andtravels more quickly than planned on another, the delay should be determined by offsetting the delivery times against each other.
Shipper's liability for delay should be excluded from the draft convention, and carrier liability for delay should only be maintained in the case where the shipper made clear to the carrier its interest in timely delivery;
As regards paragraph(b), it was suggested that delay should be taken into account only when it was tantamount to a denial of justice.
Given the Working Group's earlier decision that carrier liability for delay should be limited to situations where the carrier had agreed to deliver the goods within a certain time(see paras. 180 to 184 above) it was suggested that, as a matter of fairness, a shipper should only be liable for delay if it had so agreed.
He claims that the appropriate remedy for the delay should have been a reduction in sentence from preventive detention to a finite term.