Examples of using Division stated in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Division stated to OIOS that the documents were extremely well-received by the public.
The Deputy to the Director of the UNFPA Africa Division stated his appreciation for the findings of the mission report.
The Division stated that it was in the nature of a well-diversified portfolio to balance risk with returns.
In its case presentation to the Headquarters Committee on Contracts, the Procurement Division stated that its travel consultant had pointed out an error in computations.
The Division stated that it did not have the capacity to implement certain reforms in a timely manner and thus could achieve only limited progress.
The Director of the Investment Management Division stated that the ongoing upgrades in infrastructure would improve transparency.
The Division stated that it was currently working with Carnegie Mellon University on a database that would make the information more accessible.
In response to questions raised by the participants' group regarding socially responsible investments, the Director of the Investment Management Division stated that the budgetary request for resources for consulting services and staff had not been approved.
The Director of the Programme Division stated that the discussion on the purpose of the field visits had been very helpful to the secretariat.
The Division stated that the prior formal classification of the proposed posts(i.e., those not covered by generic job profiles), as set out in subparagraph 16(e), would result in an additional workload and might require the provision of additional resources for the Office of Human Resources Management in order to ensure the timely submission of the support account budget to the legislative bodies.
The Director of the Latin America and the Caribbean Division stated that the core of the proposed UNFPA assistance would be provided in the context and support of the ongoing social sector reform.
The Division stated that there was no organized joint pledging conference with UNDP, as the use of funds in UNDP should be country and project specific.
The Officer-in-charge of the Sustainable Energy Division stated that in recent years a series of disasters had demonstrated the vulnerability of humanity to climate change and related extreme weather events.
The Division stated that it will contact the 10 country offices that represent the bulk of the recommendations to ensure that the status is updated before the end of 2010.
In its implementation plan for the CPC recommendations, the Division stated that, to provide more long-term perspectives, it would whenever possible draw attention to current circumstances that could have an impact on long-term development prospects.
The Division stated that the cancellations should not be considered a serious matter of concern for the Division since cancellations did not automatically imply a loss of resources or money.
In its comments on an earlier draft of this report, the Division stated that at the last Committee session in January 2003, members of the Committee regretted the fact that the summary records were so late and that The Work of CEDAW was not available.
The Division stated that, as a matter of priority, their monitoring efforts focus on implementation of the more recent recommendations, from 1994, but that recommendations issued prior to that date would be followed up during future audits.
At a formal presentation to the Committee of Experts on Public Administration in April 2003, the Division stated that the programme included 22 core themes subsumed under the following new and realigned functions: governance systems and institutions(7 themes), socio-economic governance(10 themes) and knowledge management and e-government for development 5 themes.
The Division stated that, in response to recommendation 3, as well as to delays in the editing and printing process of its publications, it had adopted the practice of posting its publications in their entirety, or their executive summary on the Population Division web site.
The Investment Management Division stated that it was in the process of restating and formalizing the roles and responsibilities of both parties.
The Procurement Division stated that it had insufficient resources to undertake an assessment of the control gaps in Procure Plus and to implement compensating controls, pending implementation of the ERP system.
The Field Administration and Logistics Division stated that, in response to the OIOS report, the balance had been substantially reduced and would be further reduced as the obligations were resolved.
The Procurement Division stated that it could not require data input into Procure Plus of all bidders who responded and the amount of their bid because it lacked sufficient staff.
The Director of the Division stated that the premises of the Division were available for plenary sessions of the Commission without full interpretation.
The Procurement Division stated that accountability for local procurement activity on behalf of the missions rested with the Regional Procurement Office.
The Director of the Division stated that the premises of the Division would be available, as necessary, for plenary sessions of the Commission without full interpretation.
The Investment Management Division stated that its role with regard to the United Nations Library Endowment Fund stems from its relationship with the Investments Committee.
The Director of the Africa Division stated that she found the assertion that there was no sense of national ownership of the Zambia country programme to be very disturbing.
The Electoral Assistance Division stated to OIOS that the physical sharing of the roster was not possible currently and that UNDP had not been able to guarantee that it would not share it with third parties.
