Examples of using Draft article should in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The draft article should remain unchanged.
The Special Rapporteur thinks that this draft article should be deleted.
The draft article should remain in its current form.
In the opinion of the ICRC, the draft article should therefore read as follows.
The draft article should be retained as it stands.
His delegation therefore agreed that the draft article should be deleted.
This draft article should be rapidly concluded.
However, the term"circumvent" lacked clarity, and the draft article should therefore be revisited.
The draft article should be amended accordingly.
Furthermore, for the reasons set out below, IMF believes this draft article should be deleted in its entirety.
The draft article should therefore be drafted in the negative.
There was strong support for the view that the draft article should refer to the actual ports of loading and discharge.
The draft article should be reworded to prevent such an anomaly.
In order to obviate the risk of an imprecise orinadequate definition, the draft article should simply refer to the 1949 Geneva Conventions.
As such, this draft article should be deleted or at least significantly redrafted.
Given the significant difference between extradition andexpulsion of aliens, the draft article should be deleted on the ground of prematurity.
It was suggested that the draft article should be revised to convey that idea more appropriately.
Mr. van der Ziel(Observer for the Netherlands) expressed support for the Danish proposal, butsaid that the rest of the draft article should be retained in its current form.
The draft article should more specifically refer to immigration acts of in-country enforcement.
Finally, the Netherlands believes that the scope of this draft article should be broadened from aquifer States to all States.
Moreover, the draft article should make it clear that an affected State had a duty to protect its population.
The list contained in the draft article should not be exhaustive, but should be illustrative in nature.
Each draft article should take into account the organization's operations and the rules defining its relationship with its members.
The United States believes this draft article should be redrafted to address these concerns or else deleted.
The draft article should aim to establish an international obligation and responsibility for failure to fulfil that obligation.
It was also suggested that the draft article should state that the person"required to present" must demonstrate that it has control.
The draft article should be reworded to make it clear that States were free to request assistance from any of the enumerated actors or from others not mentioned.
The Working Group agreed that the draft article should be revised to address such instances in a manner consistent with other draft articles. .
The draft article should also emphasize the duties of neighbouring States in the event of a disaster affecting more than one State, which might involve the movement of displaced persons across borders.
Some delegations were of the view that the draft article should clearly reflect the right of the affected State or of the assisting State to terminate the assistance at any time.
