Examples of using Found that article in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
I'm telling you, the minute I found that article.
The court found that article 8(1) MAL was in principle applicable.
In the circumstances, since the State party had not advanced any grounds particular to the applicant to justify his continued detention,the Committee found that article 9, paragraph 1, had been violated.
The Committee found that article 14, paragraph 1, had been breached.
In a decision handed down on 5 December 1997(see para.109 below), the Federal Court clarified the question of the legally protected interest and found that article 261 bis protected not only public order, but also the dignity of the individual.
The Court found that Article 3 of the Convention has been violated, because of the inadequate medical care.
As regards interest, the court found that article 78 CISG was applicable.
It found that Article 49(1)(b) cannot be relied upon in the case at hand because of the express clause in the contract providing for its termination within 90 days from its conclusion.
He had understood that the Committee had found that article 9 did not apply to threats to liberty.
The Court found that Article 6(the right to a fair trial),Article 10(the right to freedom of expression) and Article 11(freedom of assembly) of the European Convention on Human Rights had been violated with respect to the applicants.
In the light of the above concerns, some delegations found that article 23 was completely unacceptable and should be deleted.
She also found that Article 8 applied because of the arbitrariness in the refusal, in particular because there was no rational basis for distinguishing between a child of 16 or above and a child below that age in this context.
However, on appeal, the Athens Court of Appeal found that article 923 was not in breach of the European Convention or the Covenant.
It found that article 11(2)(b) of the Convention was too general to be applied in a court of law, given that the article required the State only to take appropriate measures and did not prescribe the exact measures to be taken.
The Human Rights Committee, in its General Comment No. 15, had found that article 13 would not be satisfied with laws or decisions providing for collective or mass expulsions.
Intensify its efforts in discussing with religious communities and their leadership with a view to lifting its reservation to article 16, paragraph 1(c),(d) and(g), based on practices of other State parties in the region andin the Organization of Islamic Cooperation(OIC) who found that article 16 is compatible with sharia law and, thus, opted not to introduce or to withdraw their reservation to the concerned article. .
The Supreme Court found that article 9 CISG is a provision on the applicability of a usage but not on its validity.
As for the alleged violation of the author's right to family life under articles 17 and 23,the Committee considers that, since it found that article 7, of the Covenant would be violated if the author were returned to Tunisia, it deems it not necessary to further examine these claims.
Further, the Committee found that article 23.4(c) of the 1991 Constitution was not in consonance with the requirements of article 1 of the Convention.
In the case of Evans v. Trinidad and Tobago the Human Rights Committee found that article 10 of the International Covenant was violated by the conditions of his confinement.
It has also been found that article 40 applies to contractual examination and notice provisions agreed to in derogation of articles 38 and 39i.e., it excuses a buyer who has failed to comply with a contract clause governing examination of goods or a contractual provision requiring notice of non-conformity.
At the end, in case U 83/02(19 December 2003),the Constitutional Court found that Article 143 of the Labour Law violated Article 5 e and 5 i of the Convention.
The Committee has thus found that article 6 applies to the situation where a State party seeks to extradite or remove an individual to a State where he/she faces the death penalty.
There had in fact been many cases where the European Commission of Human Rights had found that article 3 of the European Convention had been violated because there had been a risk of torture.
The European Commission had found that article 8 of the European Convention, on the right to a private life, included a particular way of life, and had used it with respect to situations concerning indigenous peoples.
The Court of Appeal considered several cases subsequent to N,where the Strasbourg Court had found that Article 3 would be violated by the reception conditions for asylum seekers if they were to be removed to"safe" third countries.
The court found that article 19[article 19 MLCBI] of Schedule 1 to the Insolvency(Cross-Border) Act 2006(ICBA)(enacting the Model Law in New Zealand) extended to enabling the search for and seizure of assets believed to be in the possession of the debtor but concealed, on the basis that"it would be odd if the ability to grant such relief extended only to property known to exist and readily locatable.
In two cases concerning Lithuania(Valašinas and Karalevičius),the European Court of Human Rights found that Article 3 of the Constitution,"Prohibition of Torture", had been breached by, respectively, degrading body search and conditions of imprisonment.
The Committee therefore found that article 22, paragraph 5(b), did not preclude it from declaring the communication admissible.
As it had already found that Serbia and Montenegro was not a party to the Statute when instituting proceedings,the Court accordingly found that Article 37 could not give it access to the Court under Article 35, paragraph 2, on the basis of the Conventions dating from the early 1930s, irrespective of whether or not those instruments were in force on 29 April 1999, the date of the filing of the Application.