Examples of using Group submitted in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
This working group submitted its report in January 1994.
Recalling the extensive process of assessment by the Parties of the implementation of the Convention initiated with the report of the Ad Hoc Working Group submitted to the fifth session of the Conference of Parties.
The group submitted its report to the Secretary on 11 July 2001.
Account has been taken in the current exercise of the main lessons learned from earlier processes report of the Ad Hoc Working Group submitted to the fifth session of the Conference of the Parties, report of the first session of the CRIC, etc.
The Group submitted its report to the Council on 11 August 2004 S/2004/604.
People also translate
In November 1999, after several substantive meetings, the Ad Hoc Working Group submitted a report to EAPC which contained proposals for activities within EAPC and the Partnership for Peace programme.
The Group submitted its report to the Committee on 14 January 2002 S/2002/65.
First, it is vital to carry out the mandate of the Working Group, which in particular has been referred to as undertaking a comprehensive review of the inventory contained in the annex to the report of the Ad Hoc Working Group submitted at the sixty-third session A/63/959.
The Group submitted its report to the Assembly at its forty-first session A/41/49.
Also decides that the Ad Hoc Working Group shall continue its review of the inventory of General Assembly resolutions on revitalization annexed to the report of the Ad Hoc Working Group submitted at the sixty-seventh session of the Assembly, a and, as a result, continue to update the inventory to be attached to the report at the sixty-eighth session.
The Group submitted its final report to the Committee on 17 March 2011 S/2011/272.
The Assembly also decided that the Ad Hoc Working Group would continue its review of the inventory of Assembly resolutions on revitalization annexed to the report of the Ad Hoc Working Group submitted at the sixty-eighth session and, as a result, continue to update the inventory to be attached to the report at the sixty-ninth session of the Assembly.
The group submitted its findings to the minister, and its report was published in February 2006.
Decides that the Ad Hoc Working Group shall continue its review of the inventory of General Assembly resolutions on revitalization annexed to the report of the Ad Hoc Working Group submitted at the sixty-third session of the Assembly, a and, as a result, issue an updated version of the inventory to be attached to the report of the Ad Hoc Working Group at the sixty-seventh session.
The Group submitted its final report for that mandate period on 26 January 2006 S/2006/53.
Following several requests by the Group during the current mandate,the United States subsequently submitted a post-facto notification on 10 July 2009. The Group submitted a further request on 31 July 2009 to clarify the discrepancy between information contained on the website of the United States Embassy in Kinshasa citing training of the FARDC in“fire support”, and the notification that omitted such wording.
The group submitted an official inquiry to both the Congolese and Japanese governments, to no avail.
In that resolution,the General Assembly also decided that the Ad Hoc Working Group should continue its review of the inventory of Assembly resolutions on revitalization annexed to the report of the Ad Hoc Working Group submitted at the sixty-seventh session of the Assembly(A/67/936), and, as a result, to continue to update the inventory to be attached to the report to be submitted at the Assembly's sixty-eighth session.
The Group submitted 2 recommendations to the COP, which took action on them at its ninth meeting, on 21October.
In that resolution,the General Assembly also decided that the Ad Hoc Working Group should continue its review of the inventory of Assembly resolutions on revitalization annexed to the report of the Ad Hoc Working Group submitted at the sixty-third session of the Assembly, and, as a result, issue an updated version of the inventory to be attached to its report to be submitted at the Assembly's sixty-seventh session.
Each group submitted their deliberations to the organization's action plan committee, resulting in objectives and actions.
As part of the preparations for the first session of the Committee for the Review of the Implementation of the Convention, held in November 2002, 47 national reports were summarized and a preliminary analysis prepared, based on information drawn from the previous reporting period,recommendations set out in the report of the Ad Hoc Working Group submitted to the Conference of the Parties at its fifth session(ICCD/COP.4/AHWG/6) and the guide for the preparation of the second series national reports.
Each working group submitted project proposals for further consideration and selection for financing by interested sponsors.
Since the Group submitted the addendum to its interim report, former CNDP officers and troops have continued to join M23.
In 2011 the Group submitted a stakeholder report to the universal periodic review of Ireland, considered in Geneva in October 2011.
The Group submitted its interim report to the Sanctions Committee on 18 May 2012, which in turn transmitted it to the Security Council on 21 June 2012.
The Group submitted several business proposals but didn't have sufficient resources to invest into fundraising activities, trainings and forums.
On several occasions, the Group submitted both formal and informal interview requests to the Ivorian authorities, but, to date, no response has been forthcoming.
To this end, on 5 June 1997, the Group submitted the proposal contained in document CD/1462 which called for the establishment of an ad hoc committee on nuclear disarmament.
The Group submitted its first annual report to the Staff-Management Committee session in Arusha, United Republic of Tanzania, in June 2012.