Examples of using He asked for an explanation in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
He asked for an explanation.
He asked for an explanation of the meaning of that provision.
After mentioning examples of provisions in other States' laws for extraterritorial redress for torture victims, he asked for an explanation of Belgium's position on that issue.
He asked for an explanation of the differences between those two methods of valuation.
Referring to the statement made by the delegation that the Minister of Amerindian Affairs did not have veto power buthad the power to approve decisions, he asked for an explanation of the difference between a veto and a failure to approve a decision.
He asked for an explanation of the concept of pretrial administrative detention.
Noting that, to judge from all accounts, the Government of Gibraltar andthe Opposition held the same position, he asked for an explanation concerning the so-called fourth mode, of the existence of which he had become aware during the regional Seminar in Fiji.
Has he asked for an explanation of why a dog was shot by agents at the scene?
Another representative said that during the seminar on protecting our atmosphere for generations to come the presenter had indicated that the use of carbon tetrachloride was trending upward; that assertion, he said,was contrary to the position of the Panel, and he asked for an explanation of the discrepancy.
If that was so, he asked for an explanation of the reasons for that decision.
He asked for an explanation of the statement in paragraph 36 of the report that"partisan organization" was prohibited.
Noting the Board's findings on preparations for the implementation of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards by peacekeeping missions,which was to begin on 1 July 2013, he asked for an explanation as to the absence of dedicated resources for IPSAS implementation teams and of implementation plansfor peacekeeping operations as a whole and for each mission.
He asked for an explanation of the large increase in funding being requested for consultants and experts A/54/6 Vol. II, table 13.2.
Referring to paragraph 11 of the report, he asked for an explanation of the statement that the Ombudsman against Ethnic Discrimination had been given a litigating role in the relevant court procedures.
He asked for an explanation of an apparent discrepancy in the figures provided on the percentage of deaths in custody attributed to suicide.
In conclusion, referring to table 20.13, he asked for an explanation of the increase of $93,500 for consultants and experts; that amount seemed very high when compared with the figure of $46,900 for staff travel.
He asked for an explanation as to why the proponents of the draft decision considered that feedstock uses fell under the purview of the Montreal Protocol.
He asked for an explanation of the rules with regard to travel paid by the United Nations and what criteria were applied for the choice of airlines.
He asked for an explanation of how technical cooperation in the field of human rights could be included in all counter-terrorism efforts.
He asked for an explanation and for an estimate of when the consolidation, which should also include the procurement functions of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations, would be completed.
He asked for an explanation of how the High Commissioner decided in what situations he should concern himself with displaced persons and in what cases no intervention was called for. .
He asked for an explanation of the Secretariat's previous statement that the Pisa facility had been closed for“regular budget purposes”, and of how much and what type of money was involved in the facility.
He asked for an explanation of the effects of those amendments, which had created a marked differentiation between legal and illegal residents, and thereby opened the door to potential human rights violations.
Lastly, he asked for an explanation of the weight attached by the State party to diplomatic assurances, including in cases where it had been established that there was a risk of torture in the country of return.
He asked for an explanation of the statement in paragraph 65 that as soon as the National Resistance Movement(NRM) Government took office, and given a"politicized army and police", even criminal violence would disappear.
He asked for an explanation of the amount of $12,200 relating to overtime for the Office of the Executive Director(para. 13.12), and challenged the amount of $79,100 for consultancy services para. 13.13.
With regard to question 11, he asked for an explanation of the opposition to setting recruitment targets to increase representation of women in the labour force, particularly in light of the significant improvement in female representation in the public sector when the Government last set targets of that kind.
He asked for an explanation of the reasons behind the reservation to article 4, which specified that Monaco interpreted the reference in that article to the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and to the rights enumerated in article 5 of the Convention, as releasing States parties from the obligation to promulgate repressive laws incompatible with freedom of opinion and expression and freedom of peaceful assembly and association, which were guaranteed by those instruments.
He also asked for an explanation of the relationship between those economies and the expected savings to be transferred to the Development Account.