Examples of using He were returned in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Nothing is mentioned in the judgement concerning the risk to the complainant if he were returned to Iran.
Moreover, the State party submits that the acts the petitioner fears if he were returned to Somalia do not fall within the meaning of"torture" as defined in article 1 of the Convention because they are not acts by a public official or person acting in an official capacity.
According to the complainant, the current situation in Iran would undoubtedly lead to his persecution if he were returned to the country.
In order to determine whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be in danger of being subjected to torture if he were returned to the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Committee must take account of all factors, including the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
The Committee notes that the Minister's delegate concluded in her decision that the complainant personally ran a real risk of torture if he were returned.
Finally, the Committee wished to know what indications the author had that the police were looking for him at the present time andwhy he believed that if he were returned he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.
The complainant claims that there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected totorture on return to Iran and, therefore, Sweden would be violating article 3 of the Convention if he were returned there.
As provided in article 3, paragraph 1,the Committee must decide whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be in danger of being subjected to torture if he were returned to Mexico.
As provided in article 3, paragraph 1,the Committee must decide whether there are substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be in danger of being subjected to torture if he were returned to Honduras.
Despite the progress the author has shown in responding positively to medical treatment, his continuous illness and advanced age place him at serious risk of worsening illness andpremature death if he were returned to Timor-Leste.
Having taken account of the arguments presented by the parties, the Committee considers that the complainant has submitted sufficient elements to suggest that he would be at risk of receiving treatment that violates article 1 of the Convention if he were returned to Togo.
In the present case, the Committee notes that the political activities of the complainant's brother took place more than 17 years ago andthat they may not in themselves constitute a risk that the complainant himself would be subjected to torture if he were returned to Iran.
Moreover, even if the complainant was in fact an active member of UPADS and of CERDEC,he has not clearly established that his activities are sufficiently important to arouse the interest of the authorities if he were returned to the Congo.
It follows that the existence in a country of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant ormass violations of human rights is not in itself a sufficient reason for establishing that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture if he were returned to that country.
By proceeding in thus without considering those elements, even though they were submitted at a late stage in the proceedings,the Swiss authorities failed in their obligation to ensure that the complainant would not be at risk of being subjected to torture if he were returned to Togo.
The petitioner claims that, due to the previous attacks the petitioner has suffered at the hands of the USC, there are substantial grounds for believing that the petitioner would be in danger of being subjected to tortureon return to Somalia, and, therefore, Australia would be in violation of article 3 of the Convention if he were returned there.
Still, given that the author was never politically active, given that he is no longer a police officer, and given the passage of time since the disputed 2008 election,the Committee cannot conclude that the author would face a real risk of treatment contrary to article 7 of the Covenant if he were returned to Armenia.
The complainant claims that due to his involvement with AlNadha, the fact that he was previously arrested and interrogated by the Tunisian authorities, and the existence of a consistent pattern of gross violations of human rights, there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture onreturn to Tunisia and, therefore, Sweden would be violating article 3 of the Convention if he were returned there.
In December 2002, he was returned to Nukus Uzbekistan.
In 1924 he was returned to the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Falling ill, he was returned to New Zealand and came to Australia.
After the Armistice he was returned to Australia.
After two years, he was returned to death row without explanation from the State.
In 1917 he was returned to Australia as medically unfit.
He was returned to Germany.
He was returned to his native town, Boston, where all these persons belonged.
A month later he was returned to prison.
And one day he was returned to me.