Examples of using Indicated partial in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Afghanistan, Brunei Darussalam and Yemen indicated partial compliance with the provision under review.
Panama indicated partial implementation and Guatemala full implementation of procedures for the adoption of the national budget para. 2 a.
Cuba reported full implementation of article 9 of the Convention, while Ecuador,Guatemala and Panama indicated partial implementation.
Kenya and Mauritania indicated partial compliance and Mauritius and Sierra Leone full compliance with the non-mandatory provision of paragraph 5.
With regard to the conclusion of agreements on the final disposal of confiscated property(para. 5),Kenya and Morocco indicated partial implementation.
Kenya and Mauritius indicated partial compliance and Uganda full compliance with this provision and quoted or cited relevant legislation.
Reporting on systems of procurement designed to prevent corruption(para. 1(a)), Afghanistan, Brunei Darussalam,Pakistan and Yemen indicated partial compliance.
Mongolia indicated partial compliance with the provisions and requested specific forms of technical assistance to further their implementation.
Reporting on transparency and accountability in the management of public finances, Kenya andSierra Leone indicated partial implementation and Mauritania and Rwanda full implementation of paragraph 2 a.
Mauritania indicated partial compliance with the provision and cited applicable legislation, while Kenya and Sierra Leone reported no implementation of such measures.
Assessing measures to verify the identity of and apply enhanced scrutiny to customers of financial institutions(art. 52, para. 1),Bangladesh and Kyrgyzstan indicated partial compliance with the Convention.
Tajikistan indicated partial compliance with the provision under review, but did not comply with the obligatory reporting item of citing applicable legislation.
Mongolia also reported full compliance with article 9, with the exception of paragraph 3, regarding the prevention of falsification of public expenditure records,in respect of which it indicated partial compliance.
Kenya and Sierra Leone indicated partial compliance with the requirement of criminalizing active bribery of national public officials, as set forth in paragraph a.
While Australia and Greece reported full implementation of measures concerning public procurement andmanagement of public finances, in accordance with article 9, Malta indicated partial implementation of the article.
Turkey indicated partial implementation of measures enabling competent national authorities to give effect to a request for confiscation received by another State party art. 55, para. 1.
Mongolia assessed its legislation as non-compliant with paragraph 3, regarding the return of property confiscated pursuant to article 55,while Pakistan indicated partial compliance and the Republic of Korea full compliance with the provision under review.
Sierra Leone indicated partial compliance with the provision under review and reported the establishment of the Anti-Corruption Commission, tasked with the enforcement of anti-corruption laws and the implementation of preventive policies and measures.
With regard to the freezing or seizing of property upon issuance of a foreign freezing or seizure order(para. 2(a)), Kenya reported no compliance, while Mauritania, Morocco andSierra Leone indicated partial compliance and cited the applicable legislation.
Kenya further indicated partial compliance with the requirement to grant the anti-corruption body or bodies the necessary independence(para. 2) and, like most other States parties reporting full or partial implementation, cited relevant legislation.
With regard to the identification, tracing, freezing or seizure of proceeds of crime, as required by paragraph 2, Armenia stated that its legislation was fully compliant and cited the applicable texts,while Azerbaijan indicated partial compliance with paragraph 2.
Out of the five reporting States parties, namely Algeria, Burkina Faso, Namibia, Nigeria and the United Republic of Tanzania,Burkina Faso indicated partial compliance with the article under review and requested qualified technical assistance presently not available.
Greece reported that its code of criminal procedure was fully compliant with paragraph 1, concerning the disposal of confiscated property, and paragraph 2, on the return of confiscated property upon request by another State party,while Malta indicated partial compliance with those provisions.
Reporting on the submission of a request for order of confiscation to competent authorities, in accordance with paragraph 1, Armenia indicated partial compliance and added that its code of criminal procedure did not permit the issuance of a confiscation order on the basis of foreign requests.
Reporting on measures for the return of confiscated property upon request by another State party, as prescribed by paragraph 2, Armenia and Slovenia stated that their cited legislation was fully compliant,while Azerbaijan and Hungary indicated partial implementation of the provision.
Furthermore, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco andSierra Leone indicated partial compliance with the provision of paragraph 2(b), providing for the freezing or seizing of property upon a request that provided a reasonable basis for taking such action, while Kenya indicated no compliance with this provision.
Jordan and Kyrgyzstan indicated partial implementation of measures to introduce systems for risk management and internal control(art. 9, subpara. 2(d)), while Indonesia referred to its Presidential Decree on the Guidelines for the Government's Procurement of Goods and Services of 2003, as amended in 2004(also mentioned earlier in the present paragraph), which had introduced systems of risk management and internal control.
The United Republic of Tanzania indicated partial compliance, while Nigeria indicated no compliance, with the mandatory provision of the Convention that prescribes the issuance of advisories regarding the types of natural or legal persons to whose accounts enhanced scrutiny is to be applied art. 52, subpara. 2 a.
The United Republic of Tanzania indicated partial adoption of measures to permit its courts to order those who had committed offences of corruption to pay compensation to another State party harmed by such offences(art. 53, subpara.(b)) and of measures to permit its courts to recognize another State party's claim as a legitimate owner of property acquired through the commission of an offence of corruption art. 53, subpara. c.
Australia indicated partial implementation of measures allowing for the confiscation of property acquired through corruption without a criminal conviction, as prescribed in the non-mandatory provision of paragraph 1(c), and stated that, while under its Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987, a conviction for an offence was required before an order could be registered, under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, action to confiscate property without a criminal conviction might be initiated.