Examples of using Jerusalem should in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
All settlement activity,including in East Jerusalem, should cease immediately.
Jerusalem should be an open city, without borders, and the holy places should be open to all.
The situation of the residents of the eastern neighbourhoods of Jerusalem should be seen in the proper historical, cultural and demographic background.
Jerusalem should emerge as the capital of two States, with arrangements for the holy sites acceptable to all.
These settler activities in the Syrian Golan,the occupied Palestinian territories and Arab Jerusalem should cease without delay.
The issue of Jerusalem should be settled through negotiations, not through unilateral preemptive measures.
The State of Palestine should be viable, sovereign and contiguous, on the basis of the 1967 borders,and East Jerusalem should be its capital.
Congress declared that Jerusalem should be recognized as the capital of Israel, and that the U.S.
All Israeli settlement activities, including the natural growth of existing settlements,particularly in East Jerusalem, should be stopped immediately.
East Jerusalem should be under Palestinian sovereignty so that it may become the capital of the independent State of Palestine.
The Palestinian side continued to insist that East Jerusalem should be the Palestinian capital, as no Palestinian would accept anything less.
Jerusalem should become an international city under the umbrella of the United Nations, protected with that status by those who have the power and the moral authority to do so.
The decision by the United States concerning Jerusalem should be examined very closely, as the Committee should remain vigilant in that regard.
The fifth article of the Oslo agreement signed in September 1993 provides explicitly that the status of Holy Jerusalem should not be prejudged during the transitional stage.
The final status of Jerusalem should be resolved through negotiations in a way that reconciles the positions of both parties on their future capital.
The question of Jerusalem should be settled by the parties concerned through negotiations on the basis of the relevant United Nations resolutions.
The United States will abstain in the voting on the draft resolution on Jerusalem, consistent with our belief that the future of Jerusalem should be decided through permanent status negotiations.
The status of Jerusalem should be the topic of open negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians, in which the three religious communities represented there should play a decisive role.
Even if it were relevant, one would have thought that"unanimous" Palestinian aspiration to a capital in East Jerusalem should have been matched by a reference to the similarly widespread Israeli consensus that Jerusalem, undivided, will remain Israel's capital.
We are convinced that Jerusalem should remain undivided and that its future should be decided through permanent status negotiations, as the parties agreed in their historic 13 September 1993 Declaration of Principles.
Therefore, logically and for the sake of efficiency of labour and resources, the verification and assessment of damage caused by the construction of the wall in the occupied Palestinian territories,including East Jerusalem, should be carried out in tandem with the collection of damage claims and not be postponed to a later date, which could complicate both procedures.
We think that the final status of Jerusalem should be a result of direct negotiations between two parties there, and I think we should do anything possible to avoid further escalation in the region.
The purpose of the seminar was to affirm that Jerusalem had not been settled by Jews 3,000 years previously, as their anniversary celebrations seemed to imply;that Jerusalem was historically an Arab city with an uninterrupted Muslim presence spanning 13 centuries; and that Jerusalem should remain a city of religious tolerance, as it had been throughout its Muslim history.
It also affirms that any just andcomprehensive solution to the question of Jerusalem should include internationally guaranteed provisions to ensure the freedom of religion and of conscience of its inhabitants.
According to the resolution, Jerusalem should become a corpus separatum, which the Palestinian side is willing to take into consideration and to reconcile with the Palestinian position that East Jerusalem is part of the Palestinian territory and the capital of the Palestinian State.
The draft resolution also recalls the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and stresses that any comprehensive andjust solution to the issue of Jerusalem should take into account the legitimate concerns of both the Palestinian and Israeli sides and should include internationally guaranteed provisions to ensure the freedom of religion and of conscience of all inhabitants.
Any decisions affecting Jerusalem should be left for the final stage of the peace negotiations; however, with the establishment of the Har Homa settlement, the settlement belt around the City will be completed before the final stage of negotiations regarding the status of Jerusalem is carried out;
In its resolution 68/16 of 26 November 2013, the Assembly stressed that a comprehensive, just andlasting solution to the question of the city of Jerusalem should take into account the legitimate concerns of both the Palestinian and Israeli sides and should include internationally guaranteed provisions to ensure the freedom of religion and of conscience of its inhabitants, as well as permanent, free and unhindered access to the holy places by the people of all religions and nationalities.
Japan believes that issues relating to Jerusalem should be resolved through the permanent status negotiations between the parties concerned, and until such solution is achieved both the parties should refrain from taking any unilateral action relating to the situation in Jerusalem. .