Examples of using Lethal force in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Use of lethal force by police.
These men in beige gloves are hunting a lethal force.
Lethal force may not be used purely to protect property;
Excessive use of force, including lethal force.
Potentially lethal force was justifiable only when it was necessary to protect life.
Mr. El Masry had referred to the excessive use of lethal force.
Domestic laws on the use of lethal force by law enforcement officials.
He prefers that situations be resolved through dialogue instead of lethal force.
Case study: the use of lethal force by law enforcement officials.
She noted that the human right to life placed stringent conditions on the use of lethal force.
The use of lethal force must also meet the requirement of proportionality.
So on the one hand,there is the principle of military necessity which permits the use of lethal force.
This strips the use of lethal force of its usual safeguards- without providing any alternative safeguards.
It also discusses the legal norms applicable to the use of lethal force during demonstrations.
The use of lethal force by law enforcement officers must be regulated within the framework of human rights law.
Some such domestic laws are in compliance with the international principles regarding the use of lethal force.
With the attackers inside the base,UNMISS troops used lethal force, firing at the attackers to repel them.
The Legal Director of the Foundation for Fundamental Rights elaborated on the principles of proportionality andnecessity in the use of lethal force.
In some of the States considered for this Report, lethal force is allowed in the protection of property.
Governments needed to focus on development of police tools andstrategies that minimized the need for use of lethal force during arrest.
In particular, firearms and lethal force should only be used as a last resort when lives are under direct threat;
It is particularly disturbing that the Constitution allows for the use of lethal force for the defence of property.
Existing legislation governing the use of lethal force by police officers was basically consistent with international standards.
Naturally, with the development of mankind, weapons have evolved in parallel,achieving ever greater efficiency(ie, lethal force), and the accuracy of the application.
For lethal force to be considered to be lawful it must be used in a situation in which it is necessary for self-defence or the defence of another's life.
In most of these countries, the police have greater powers to use lethal force during demonstrations than otherwise.
The military representatives of someStates indicate that humans will, for the foreseeable future, remain in the loop on any decisions to use lethal force.
Police and independent monitoring agencies needed to keep data on use of lethal force and other dangerous forms of coercion.
The use of lethal force during an armed conflict situation will only be lawful if such force is used in strict conformity with international humanitarian law.
For societies with access to it, modern technology allows increasing distance to be put between weapons users and the lethal force they project.