Examples of using Position on article in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
His position on article xx remained flexible.
I have stated our position on article 42.
Australia's position on article 111 was in line with that of the Danish delegation.
The Government is requested to review its position on articles 21 and 22 of the Convention.
Mr. MANONCI(United Republic of Tanzania)announced that his delegation also wished to reserve its position on article 32.
A number of delegations reserved their position on article 4 until the scope of the phrase"United Nations personnel" had been clarified.
The representative of India requested that the report of the Ad Hoc Committee reflect his Government's position on article 4, paragraph 2.
The CHAIRMAN said that Turkey had reserved its position on articles 12 to 19 and had proposed that articles 12 to 15 should be changed.
The whole of chapter IV, on“international crimes”, is the object of a reservation in principle by France taking into account its position on article 19.
The representative of Japan expressed support for the Australian position on article 9, in particular regarding the concept of“nation”.
Its position on article 4 of the Convention, namely, that it condemned racist propaganda and organizations, was limited by the constitutional provisions relating to freedom of expression.
Mr. LALLIOT(France) recalled that his delegation had reserved its position on article 4 and the subsequent articles. .
However it did not adopt a position on article 7(2), regarding the restrictions on access by the holders of fishing permits to the fish stocks.
Ms. BAUTISTA said that she had referred queries on her Government's position on article 14 to her capital.
Syria should reconsider its position on article 20 of the Convention, and consider making the declarations under articles 21 and 22.
He saw a contradiction between the Government's interpretative declaration with respect to article 6 of the Convention and its position on article 14 of the Convention.
At that meeting, Peru explained the country's position on article 8(j) of the Convention on Biological Diversity, relating to the protection of traditional knowledge relating to biodiversity.
However, the reference to the matter in paragraph 7 of document A/CN.9/XXXV/CRP.1/Add.4 did not clearly explain his delegation's position on article 11, paragraph 3.
Mr. LALLIOT(France) said that France reserved its position on article 4 until agreement had been reached on the principle, and not merely on the form, of article 3 and of article 1, if necessary.
The representative of Bangladesh requested that the report of the Ad Hoc Committee on its eleventh session reflect his country's position on article 16, paragraph 5.
Ms. Goonesekere, commenting on Singapore's seemingly contradictory position on article 9, said that the discrimination inherent in its legislation on nationality reflected the State's colonial legal tradition.
Ms. Schöpp-Schilling welcomed the fact that Malaysia was reviewing its stance on reservations, butsaid that she remained puzzled by its position on article 5 a.
Mrs. VARGAS de LOSADA(Colombia)said that her delegation's position on article 5 had already been set forth in document A/51/275, but that it nevertheless supported the Turkish proposal concerning paragraph 2 of that article. .
Mr. AMER(Egypt), noting that he had reserved his position on article 17, paragraph 3, said that a proposal was now being made in that paragraph linking the period of suspension of the implementation of planned measures to the peaceful resolution of the dispute in question.
The representatives of Brazil and Cuba also agreed with this position, but stated that if they were to take a position on article 4 at that time, they would choose option 3.
Mrs. DASKALOPOULOU-LIVADA(Greece) said that her delegation supported the current wording and endorsed the comments made by Sri Lanka, Hungary andViet Nam regarding the Swiss position on article 4.
The representative of Colombia requested that the report of the Ad Hoc Committee reflect his Government's position on article 4, paragraph 2, of the draft Protocol, namely, that it considered itself not to be bound by the decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on that provision.
Mr. SVIRIDOV(Russian Federation)said that his country was listed in footnote 2 to document A/C.6/51/NUW/WG/L.1/Add.4 as one of the States that had reserved their position on article 2, subparagraph b.
Japan, Guatemala, Norway, Poland, the Republic of Korea, Russia andVenezuela(Bolivarian Republic of) reserved their position on article 14 at this stage, while Argentina, Mexico, Slovenia and Ukraine could see the possible usefulness of a fund based on voluntary contributions.