Examples of using Requesting extradition in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
A State requesting extradition is permitted to participate in the proceedings.
Any decision adopted by these authorities shall be communicated to the State requesting extradition.
The state requesting extradition does ensure reciprocity of extradition. .
Iv the possibility of subsequent surrender orextradition between the Court and the State requesting extradition; and.
The interests of the State requesting extradition, including, where relevant, whether the offence was committed in its territory and the nationality of the victims of the offence;
The possibility of subsequent surrender orextradition between the Court and the State requesting extradition.
Beginning with 2006, the Republic of Serbia has demanded from countries requesting extradition guarantees that the person shall not be subjected to torture, inhuman treatment or ill-treatment.
Since its entry into force in 2004, the European arrest warrant has become the main instrument for requesting extradition within Europe.
Iii the interests of the State requesting extradition, including, where relevant, whether the offence was committed in its territory and the nationality of the victims of the offence; and.
Following the issuance of the decree accepting ordenying the request for extradition, the State requesting extradition is notified to that effect.
In relation to extradition, paragraph 22(3)(b) of the Extradition Act 1998 specifically provides that a person is only to be surrendered if the Attorney-General is satisfied that the person will not be subjected to torture in the country requesting extradition.
Iv the possibility of subsequent[surrender][transfer][extradition]or extradition between the Court and the State requesting extradition.
She stressed that recent experiences inthe Latin American and Caribbean region had underscored the need for States requesting extradition or other transfers to respect national judicial procedure, especially when these were in keeping with accepted standards of due process.
Articles 590 and 615 of the Code of Criminal Procedure dealt with extradition, which was based on treaties,the written customary law in force in the country requesting extradition or the principle of reciprocity.
Enforcement in the Convention according to the latter meaning of the term, andthus establishment of the right of States Parties to refuse extradition on the grounds that the State requesting extradition may impose an unreasonably mild punishment on the offender, would be a risky though progressive step towards limiting even further the possibilities for members of organized criminal groups to find a“safe haven”.
The practice in Uzbekistan is that the Convention against Torture serves as the legal basis for the extradition of individuals guilty of offences such as torture andcomplicity in torture if the State requesting extradition is a party to that Convention.
The requested State may not, however, deny a request for surrender made under this article in deference to another State's request for extradition of the same person for the same offence,if the State requesting extradition is a State party, and the Court has ruled the case before it admissible, and its decision took into consideration the proceedings in that State which gave rise to its extradition request. .
Regarding extradition, s 22(3)(b) of the Extradition Act 1998(Cth)specifically provides that a person is not to be surrendered unless the Attorney-General is satisfied that the person will not be subject to torture in the country requesting extradition.
According to the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is also prohibited to extradite a person to a foreign country,if reasonable grounds exist to expect that in the country requesting extradition the person could be sentenced to the death penalty or the death penalty can be carried out on him/her, or the person can be subjected to torture.
When deciding on an individual case of extradition, the competent authorities in Montenegro take all relevant factors into consideration, including the possible existence of systematic, grave, evident ormass violation of human rights in the State requesting extradition.
Within one week from the date of arrest of the person whose extradition is sought,the judicial authority in the country requesting extradition must send a telex to support the extradition request. .
The offences set forth in article(s)____ shall be treated, for the purposes of extradition between States Parties, as if they had been committed not only in the place in which they occurred but also in a place within the jurisdiction of the State Party requesting extradition.
Pursuant to the Code of Criminal Procedure,it is also prohibited to extradite a person to a foreign country if reasonable grounds exist to expect that in the country requesting extradition the person could be sentenced to the death penalty or the death sentence could be meted out, or that the person may be subjected to torture.
The offences established in article(s)____[alternatively: the offences covered by this Convention] shall be treated, for the purposes of extradition between States Parties, as if they had been committed not only in the place in which they occurred but also in a place within the jurisdiction of the State Party requesting extradition.
Some conventions provide that prosecution under this provision is subject to the possibility for the State requesting extradition and the requested State to agree otherwise;
The Committee takes note of, inter alia, article 88 of the Criminal Code that prohibits expulsion of an"offender that enjoys protection pursuant to the ratified international treaties", and the Criminal Procedure Code(article 525, paragraph 2) that prohibits expulsion where there are"serious reasons to believe that the foreignercan be exposed to ill-treatment or torture in the State requesting extradition.
When a State party which makes extradition conditional on the existence of a treaty receives a request for extradition from another State party with which it does not have an extradition treaty,the State party requesting extradition may, at its option, consider this Convention as a legal basis for extradition in respect of the offences.
With regard to the first part of the obligation, it was observed that, while the Commission would need to examine limitations on extradition(such as those concerning political offences, the nationals of the custodial State, orthe case where specific safeguards for the protection of the rights of the individual would not be guaranteed by the State requesting extradition), it should be cautious not to embark into an analysis of the technical aspects of extradition law.
The requested State may not, however, deny a request for the[surrender][transfer][extradition]made under this article in deference to another State's request for extradition of the same person for the same offence if the State requesting extradition is a State Party and the Court has ruled the case before it is admissible, and its decision took into consideration the proceedings in that State which gave rise to its extradition request. .