Examples of using Source argues in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The source argues the following.
Therefore, the preventive detention order pursuant to the J&K PSA was passed by the authorities only to frustrate the ordinary course of criminal justice, so the source argues.
The source argues that temporary detainment orders were not available.
Consequently, the source argues, there are no valid grounds for his detention.
The source argues that the speediness and secrecy surrounding their trial demonstrate the political motive behind their arrests and subsequent convictions.
Accordingly, the source argues that the arrest, detention and imprisonment of Mr. Rafalskiy are arbitrary.
The source argues that the sentence was in contravention of Indonesian law.
The source argues that for 19 days, Sithu Zeya was illegally detained.
The source argues that Mr. Karma's detention violates his rights under the Indonesian constitution.
The source argues that the Tribunal acted in violation of section 11, paragraph 5, of the Act.
Fifthly, the source argues that the legality of the decision to detain Mr. Nyamoya has not been verified.
The source argues that the arrest and detention of Messrs. Newiri, Kudziwe, and Ndele is arbitrary.
The source argues that the arrest of these persons is unlawful and their detention is arbitrary.
The source argues that Mr. Omar's detention is arbitrary, as he was sentenced under a mistaken identity.
The source argues that Mr. Al Ammari's detention is arbitrary, as there is no legal basis for his detention.
First, the source argues that Mr. Sanad's detention lacks any legal basis and on this count is arbitrary.
The source argues that the deprivation of liberty of Ms. Ngendahoruri is arbitrary since it has no legal basis.
The source argues that since his arrest on 7 April 2007, Mr. al Chouitier has been detained without any legal basis.
Firstly, the source argues that in the present case there is no legal basis to justify Mr. Tabarzadi's deprivation of liberty.
The source argues that the deprivation of liberty of Thich Huyen Quang is arbitrary because it is devoid of any legal basis.
In this respect, the source argues that the Government does not factually dispute that the"responsible team" subjected Mr. Gam to torture.
The source argues the family's guilt by association with suicide of Ann Gyung Shin violates international human rights law.
The source argues that Mr. Mejri is a prisoner of conscience, detained for having exercised his right to freedom of opinion and expression.
The source argues that the Body of principles apply whatever the circumstances and do not permit suspension in times of crisis.
The source argues that Mr. Jama's detention is arbitrary, as there is no legal basis justifying his detention.
The source argues that with the expiration of Ms. Suu's detention on 25 May 2008, the Working Group's Opinion No. 2/ 007 expired as well.
The source argues that Mr. Al Zumer is being detained in violation of articles 9(2) and 14(1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The source argues that Mr. Najdi's detention is arbitrary, as he was arrested without any reason and is detained without legal basis.
The source argues that this constitutes a violation of principles 15 and 19 of the Body of Principles and an arbitrary detention according to category III of the Working Group.
The source argues that the arrest, detention and conviction of the four above-mentioned men violated their right to a fair trial and has led to arbitrary detention.