Examples of using Substantial basis in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Secondly, there is no substantial basis for the complainant's fear of returning to Bangladesh.
The General Assembly, with its universal membership, should continue to deal with human rights on a substantial basis.
It considers, however,that there is no substantial basis for his fear of returning to Bangladesh.
Within thirty days from the receipt of an application under paragraph 1 of this article, the Committee shall decide whether ornot there is a substantial basis for the application.
The office would review whether there is a substantial basis for an application and, if so, mediate between the parties.
The former were not only litigants in the case butalso decided whether there was a substantial basis for the application.
The evidence suggests that the allegation arose without any substantial basis to support it and was reported to the Office of Internal Oversight Services without sufficient enquiry to ascertain the facts.
With regard to the detection of water-related diseases,the Signatories recognized that a substantial basis exists for monitoring these diseases, but.
After consideration of the aforementioned applications, the Committee decided, respectively, that there was not a substantial basis for the applications of Mr. Vorobiev, Ms. Burtis and Mr. Cure under article 11 of the statute of the Administrative Tribunal and therefore concluded that the International Court of Justice should not be requested to give an advisory opinion in respect of Judgements Nos. 666, 672 and 687.
Under article 11, paragraph 2, of the statute of the Administrative Tribunal, the Committee shall decide within 30 days from receipt of an application whether ornot there is a substantial basis for such application.
However, supplemented with other information, these reports form a substantial basis for further investigative work, which might lead to prosecution.
The Committee decided, without a vote, that there was not a substantial basis for the application under article 11 of the statute of the Administrative Tribunal and therefore concluded that the International Court of Justice should not be requested to give an advisory opinion in respect of Judgement No. 630 delivered by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal in the case of Kofi against the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
The function assigned to the Committee established by article 11 of the statute is to determine whether there is"a substantial basis" for an application for appeal made in terms of article 11 of the statute.
The Committee decided unanimously that there was not a substantial basis for the application of Mr. Leung-Ki under article 11 of the statute of the Administrative Tribunal and therefore concluded that the International Court of Justice should not be requested to give an advisory opinion in respect of Judgement No. 639 delivered by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal in the case of Leung-Ki against the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
Under article 11 of the statute of the Administrative Tribunal, the Committee was limited to reviewing applications submitted to it in order to determine whether a substantial basis existed for requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice.
The Committee decided, without a vote, that there was not a substantial basis for the application of Mr. Cure under article 11 of the Statute of the Administrative Tribunal and therefore concluded that ICJ should not be requested to give an advisory opinion in respect of Judgement No. 687 delivered by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal in the case of Cure against the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
Some bilateral treaties also contain provisions for denial of extradition on humanitarian grounds orwhere there is a substantial basis for believing that the extradition request has been made for the purpose of prosecuting or punishing the person sought on account of that person's race, religion, nationality or political opinion.
The Committee decided without a vote that there was not a substantial basis for the application under article 11 of the statute of the Administrative Tribunal and therefore concluded that the International Court of Justice should not be requested to give an advisory opinion in respect of Judgement No. 700 delivered by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal in the case of Benthin against the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
The Committee decided, without a vote, that there was not a substantial basis for the application under article 11 of the statute of the Administrative Tribunal and therefore concluded that the International Court of Justice should not be requested to give an advisory opinion in respect of Judgement No. 606 delivered by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal in the case of Paraiso against the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
The Committee decided unanimously that there was not a substantial basis for the application of Mr. Ali Camara under article 11 of the statute of the Administrative Tribunal and therefore concluded that the International Court of Justice should not be requested to give an advisory opinion in respect of Judgement No. 642 delivered by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal in the case of Sow, Kane, Diatte, Dienne and Camara against the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
The Committee decided without a vote that there was not a substantial basis for the application of Mr. Huzeima under article 11 of the statute of the Administrative Tribunal and therefore concluded that the International Court of Justice should not be requested to give an advisory opinion in respect of Judgement No. 745 delivered by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal in the case of Huzeima against the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.
The Committee decided unanimously that there was not a substantial basis for the application of Mr. Hourani under article 11 of the statute of the Administrative Tribunal and therefore concluded that the International Court of Justice should not be requested to give an advisory opinion in respect of Judgement No. 654 delivered by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal in the case of Hourani against the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.
The Committee decided, without a vote, that there was not a substantial basis for the application of Mr. Shkukani under article 11 of the statute of the Administrative Tribunal and therefore concluded that the International Court of Justice should not be requested to give an advisory opinion in respect of Judgement No. 628 delivered by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal in the case of Shkukani against the Commissioner-General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.