Examples of using Trigger level in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The trigger level needs scientific justification.
Some Members believed that there is a need to review the trigger level.
The trigger level needs scientific justification.
A good example of this is the current'trigger level'(of 620 000 tonnes) for krill.
Tonnes with a trigger level of 620 000 tonnes Fishing method as in Annex 21-03/A See also Conservation Measure 51-07.
For example, both models predicted fairly small risks around the trigger level for Fishing Options 2 and 3.
The study also suggested that the trigger level is less than 2% of krill biomass estimated in any year 2000 to 2011.
In stage 2, confidence is needed that there are no local impacts as the fishery expands towards the trigger level.
These estimates of krill flux exceed the trigger level and the precautionary catch limit in Area 48.
Without the use of reference areamonitoring and/or structured fishing, progress beyond the existing catch trigger level could be more restricted.
However, it agreed that,should all the trigger level be taken from a concentrated area, then it may have effects on local predators.
The Working Group also noted the current requirement for vessels to begin reporting catches at 10-day intervals once the catch reaches 80% of the trigger level CM 23-06.
The research activities must commence immediately the trigger levels have been reached and must be completed before the vessel leaves the SSRU.
Because of these uncertainties he called for the Scientific Committee andCommission to follow the precautionary approach that differentiates CCAMLR from other forums and to maintain the trigger level.
The Workshop also noted that separate trigger levels may also need to be developed for encounters with rare and unique populations paragraphs 3.4 and 3.5.
To conduct a mergers and acquisitions study in Malaysia, especially to determine the following:(i) current market situation and practice; and(ii)appropriate threshold/trigger levels;
She recalled that trigger level does not reflect the status of krill stock and predators in the times past as well as the current status of krill stock and predators.
The Working Group noted that several papers contained information relevant to discussions on the subdivision of the trigger level among statistical subareas in Area 48 and to the revision of CM 51-07.
As a result, the catch trigger level of 620 000 tonnes has been set to avoid substantial impacts on predators while appropriate management approaches are developed.
Accordingly, it advised the Scientific Committee that the precautionary subarea allocation scheme for the trigger level described in CM 51-07 should be retained until sufficient information is acquired for its revision.
The trigger level has remained the same despite significant increased estimates for krill biomass B0 and allowable catch in Area 48 during recent years increasing allowable catch from 4 million tonnes to 5.61 million tonnes.
Barrera-Oro(Argentina) highlighted that the interim allocated trigger level has been reached for the third time in Subarea 48.1 and that this is likely to continue to occur in the future.
The trigger level has remained the same magnitude despite significant increased estimates for krill biomass B0 and allowable catch in Area 48 during recent years, particularly the allowable catch increased from 4 million tonnes(2007) to 5.61 million tonnes since 2011.
Taking into account the current state of krill fishery in Area 48 and other important factors,Ukraine proposes to upgrade the Conservation Measure 51-07 in order to redistribute the trigger level of catch in 620 000 tonnes between Subareas in Area 48 in a new percentage limits.
There is not scientific-based argument that trigger level should be established at the level of 620 000 tonnes and used as the precautionary catch limit for Area 48.
The Working Group recalled its advice of 2009(SC-CAMLR-XXVIII, Annex 4, paragraphs 3.127 to 3.138) that, to be consistent withthe precautionary approach and to avoid concentration of the catch as the trigger level is approached, a spatial allocation of the trigger level(620 000 tonnes) by subarea(CM 51-07) is required.
The Working Group noted that setting appropriate trigger levels relies on estimating the relationship between VME by-catch observed on board the vessel and the abundance of actual VME taxa density on the seafloor.
In the situation where neither reference areas nor structured fishing is used,it may be possible to obtain sufficient information about the system to allow catches to increase beyond the trigger level, but the impacts of the fishery and the resilience of the ecosystem to these impacts are likely to remain poorly understood.
Simulations also indicated that the 2-tonne trigger level currently set to activate Annex 41-01/C was too low and could result in an unintentional breach of the conservation measure.
Dr Kasatkina recalled that the trigger level for the krill fishery in Area 48(620 000 tonnes) corresponds to the value of the maximum historical catch achieved during the 1980s and reflects neither the status of the krill stock and predators in the past nor the current status of the krill stock and predators.