Examples of using Working group also notes in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Working Group also notes the excessive use of detention on remand.
The Working Group also notes that Mr. Soltani was tried and sentenced by a revolutionary court.
The Working Group also notes that there is a demand for many assistance activities, especially from countries of EECCA and SEE.
The Working Group also notes that most Malaysian prisons met international standards on conditions.
The Working Group also notes that the charge of genocide denial was cleared by the Supreme Court as far as Ms. Uwimana's case is concerned.
The Working Group also notes that the Government has informed it that the above-mentioned persons are no longer in detention.
The Working Group also notes the work carried out by the police and the Hellenic Coast Guard in combating trafficking in human beings.
Finally, the Working Group also notes that Mr. Jayasundaram was not brought in personam before the court during the habeas corpus hearings.
The Working Group also notes the efforts made by the authorities to improve the judicial system and legal framework inherited from Soviet times.
The Working Group also notes that many communications are not translated in time, thus delaying their consideration by the Working Group. .
The Working Group also notes that the Government concerned has informed the Group that the above-mentioned person is no longer in detention.
The Working Group also notes that the Government has not refuted the allegation that Mr. Al Abadi could not benefit from the norms of due process.
The Working Group also notes the allegations by the source that Mr. Najdi was arrested because he had publicly supported the"UAE 94" through his Twitter account.
The Working Group also notes that the Government concerned has informed the Group that the above-mentioned person is no longer in detention.
The Working Group also notes that the Government concerned has informed the Group(and the source has confirmed) that Walter Ledesma has been released.
The Working Group also notes that apparently the referral of the case to the court which sentenced him was not in conformity with the procedure in force in Mauritania.
The Working Group also notes that enforced disappearance is among the crimes which are excluded from the military jurisdiction, in accordance with article 16 of the Declaration.
The Working Group also notes that Mr. Al-Hattar has never been brought before a judge and that he has not been formally charged with a concrete criminal offence attributed to him.
The Working Group also notes that in its reply the Government fails to state the exact date of Mr. Khaled Matari's arrest, whereas the source asserts that he was secretly held in a barracks for over a year.
The Working Group also notes the upcoming review of the complaints mechanism of the Inter-American Development Bank, and encourages the use of the Guiding Principles as a key reference in this process.
The Working Group also notes that, in spite of the fact that many States have ratified the main international instruments relating to detention, their implementation in many countries leaves much to be desired.
The Working Group also notes that, although the Government has not challenged the complaints, it has been informed of the release of the detainee, whose case was dismissed by the ordinary Mexican courts.
However, the Working Group also notes the tendency of some national military forces to privatize and offer their contracted services to extractive industries, mainly oil companies, as experienced in Ecuador.
The Working Group also notes that the above-mentioned persons were detained incommunicado without any legal justification following their arrest and that the charges subsequently laid against them were vague and imprecise.
The Working Group also notes the key role that national human rights institutions can play in the implementation of the Guiding Principles, and encourages close cooperation between other State institutions and national human rights institutions.
The Working Group also notes the challenges faced with regard to implementing the corporate responsibility to respect, and identifies as priorities the need to collect and disseminate evidence of practice and issue guidance on.
The Working Group also notes that Mr. Ondo Abaga had been recognized as a refugee in Benin and that the action by the security services of Equatorial Guinea in that country amounts to a grave transgression of the principle of non-refoulement established in the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 1951.
The Working Group also noted that some States were developing such national legislation.
The working group also noted that no recosting had been applied under nonpost items.
The Working Group also noted the successful conclusion, in 1995.