Examples of using Same damage in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
This will do the same damage as brushing too hard.
But in the wrong hands,hair removal can cause the same damage.
The sun can do the same damage to our hair as it does to our skin.
Whoever lit this,they could easily have used gasoline or kerosene to do the same damage.
Fatty liver can cause the same damage as alcohol.
In contrast, the cell, like tearing off the chain starts to make itself likeabsolutely unnecessary body cells with exactly the same damaged DNA.
The arbitrator may award the same damages to you individually as a court could.
If damage has occurred as a result of the joint action of several persons,or if several persons are concurrently responsible for the same damage, they are all jointly and severally implicated.
In situations where several persons are liable for the same damage, the principle of the protection of the consumer requires the possibility of obtaining full compensation for the damage from any one of those persons.
Will the compensation that I get, or can get for the same damages but from other sources e. g.
Where an action for compensation for pollution damage has been brought before a court competent under article IX of the 1992 Liability Convention against the owner of a ship or his guarantor, such court shall have exclusive jurisdictional competence over any action against the Supplementary Fund for compensation under theprovisions of article 4 of this Protocol in respect of the same damage.
Domestic transport insurance covers the same damages as international transport insurance.
In those circumstances, passengers departing originally from an airport located in a Member State could claim the benefit of thatprotection only once if they were to suffer the same damage on the outward and the return legs.
At present it is known that in both syndromes the same damage to the gray matter of the brain takes place.
Member States shall ensure that a final decision of an administrative authority or a court, including a final injunction order referred to in Article 5(2)(b), considered as evidence establishing the existence or non-existence of that infringement for the purposes of any other actions seeking redress before their national courts against thesame trader for the same facts providing that the same damage cannot be compensated twice to the same consumers concerned.
Quite simply, if ultrasound can injure babies,it can cause the same damage whether done for routine, diagnostic or“entertainment” purposes.
As regards the existence of a causal link between the wrongful act and the damage suffered, the applicant is of the view that the principle of proximate causes requires that theCourt examine whether it would have suffered the same damage in the absence of any wrongful act committed by the Council.
The action, which is still pending, concerns, to a degree, the same damage which is the subject of the main proceedings before the referring court.
As far as the contracting carrier and the actual carrier within the meaning of Article 39 of the MontrealConvention can be held liable for the same damage, Member States may establish specific measures to avoid double insurance.
Whereas, in situations where several persons are liable for the same damage, the protection of the consumer requires that the injured person should be able to claim full compensation for the damage from any one of them;
Moreover, the confusion which the Court of Justice of the European Union claims to exist between the material damage alleged, consisting in a loss of opportunity, and the non-material damage alleged,and the risk that the same damage will be compensated for twice, fall to be considered as part of the assessment of the merits of the action.
However, an arbitrator can award on an individual basis the same damages and relief as a court(including statutory damages, attorneys' fees and costs), and must follow and enforce these Terms as a court would.
The Directive foresees that where two or more persons are liable for the same damage, they shall be liable jointly and severally, without prejudice to the provisions of national law concerning the rights of contribution or recourse(Article 5).
Where, as a result of the provisions of this Directive,two or more persons are liable for the same damage, they shall be liable jointly and severally, without prejudice to the provisions of national law concerning the rights of contribution or recourse.
For example,when several individuals have the same claim against the same trader for the same damage, all these claims could be grouped together, ideally by the court, and dealt with by the simplified procedures envisaged for individual small claims.
UV light has the same damaging effects on your eyes as it does your skin.
If you want to find a treatment option that is still going to show you howto get rid of pubic lice but does not come with the same damaging side effects, we highly recommend natural options as some of the best medications for pubic lice treatment.
But do these fizzy drinks have the same damaging effects on your teeth?