Examples of using This solution would in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
This solution would please everybody.
There is no doubt this solution would work.
This solution would not require any modification of the Treaties.
All the appeals are accepted even if this solution would require spli ing some classes into two;
This solution would oblige the sector to take more responsibility for its situation.
They didn't even discuss the separation of the girls: this solution would either kill one of the girls or would impair the lives of both of them.
This solution would be politically consensual since it would cost nothing to the creditor countries.
Separate system operators without ownership unbundling: This solution would require separation of system operation from ownership of the assets.
This solution would add undue complexity and thus defies the call for more simple legislation.
However, since almost everybody would have to learn either of these from scratch, this solution would be equally hard and not terribly useful in relations with the rest of the world.
This solution would entail a significant and probably disproportionate intrusion in Member States' legislations.
Peter Marie, this solution would make the problem go away.
This solution would be highly flexible, because CRAs would be able to apply the‘comply or explain' principle.
They know how this solution would affect the state of their properties.
This solution would not preclude national structures being used for national and locally established funds.
We believe this solution would not fully ensure the security of supplies.
This solution would never have been possible without Signiant Jet's acceleration, reliability and multi-layered security technology.
For some measures this solution would create appreciable differences of treatment between ships without justification.
This solution would remove legal fragmentation in the field of contract law and lead to a uniform application and interpretation of the Regulation's provisions.
In a context of unstable public finances, this solution would involve steeper reductions of Member States' tax revenues; implementation would be more difficult; and it would be inconsistent with the aim of eliminating the distortions deriving from the difference in scope between the Directive and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive.
This solution would require the implementation of complex cross-licensing systems and a number of content creators could find themselves excluded from the market, as a result, for example, of not using DRM.
In a way, this solution would suffer from the same structural problem often identified with the privatisation of land: the lack of a certain base for the distribution of rights.
This solution would make it possible to draw on existing experience such as that of the European Capitals for Culture or the European Union Prize for Cultural Heritage/ Europa Nostra Awards.
This solution would also mean that appointments to the Commission would not have to be made in such a complex way in accordance with the nationality key and the European Council would not have to have such complex vote-counting arrangements.
This solution would enable Member States to tax comparable products(fermented products to which alcohol has been added) equally, on the basis of their alcohol content, while reducing the need to draw a clear distinction between products classified under CN-heading 2206 and 2208.
This solution would help establish, to some extent, a common framework, at least concerning the reference criteria that CRAs had to fulfil; however, it could not include an enforcement mechanism and thus would have limited effectiveness in achieving the policy objectives.
This solution would ensure a level playing field within the Community for all market players, instead of a fragmented legal regime for CRAs throughout 27 Member States, which could arise if the EU does not act but keeps the current self-regulatory regime based on the IOSCO Code.
Secondly, this solution would significantly limit flexibility without addressing another genuine problem related to mobility: how to take account of supervised professional practice, an aspect of architectural education which is already recognised in many Member States as an important feature of training architects?
However, it appears that this solution would have led to the same outcome, since in fact the same operators, namely Orange, SFR and Bouygues Télécom, would in any case have been the only applicants and they would ultimately have been awarded licences that, in substance, were identical to those they actually obtained.
This solution would, however, also impose disproportionate administrative burdens on traders, as they would always have to determine the place of establishment of their client and, in the absence of a one-stop mechanism, would have to register in every Member State where they have non-taxable customers and to collect and remit tax to those Member States.